Pointless Pools

nonamethanks said:

BUR #25737 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

mass update pool:3882 -> dezombification
nuke pool:3882

As above for voting. It will need to be cleaned up a bit.

As far as naming things go, I think a dezombification tag in general is a good idea, but it should not be used as a substitute for this pool. There could still be cases in which Yoshika can bend her arms normally while still showing other zombie-like traits. A name that would better fit the proposed tag would be something like unusually flexible arms or pliable arms, but I think tagging zombie pose when appropriate and filtering it out in searches (as suggested in forum #92608) is the best way to go, even if it means we're tagging the more common case rather than the exception.

pool #20865
i don't quite understand what this pool is, but it feels like it should be a tag if the creator desires to categorize these eyebrows

BUR #25870 has been rejected.

mass update pool:20865 -> peak_eyebrows
nuke pool:20865

This was brought up in this thread before a few months ago (forum #254286). Let's see if we can do something about it.

Tag name is the same as the pool's name.

BUR #25871 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

mass update pool:20865 -> raised_inner_eyebrows
nuke pool:20865

Alternate name for the tag in the above BUR. I feel there could be a better name for this, but this was the best one I could find for now.

pool #4243 (Pokemon-like Food)

Should this be replaced with character food?

The_Bob said:

pool #4243 (Pokemon-like Food)

Should this be replaced with character food?

I think so. Character food + pokemon justified that pool

But most of post in that pool not tag as character food yet.

BUR #26018 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

mass update pool:4243 -> character_food
nuke pool:4243

Kuruma said:

I think so. Character food + pokemon justified that pool

But most of post in that pool not tag as character food yet.

How about this?

pool #20887 (Characters and their own depictions)

This felt like it should be better off as its own tag, since 99% of posts in this pool are NSFW following the format of "character doing casual things while someone else is holding a sexual picture of them, or vice-versa".

It seems like a pool likely related to topic #26639 was made, pool #22382.

Given that I found it because it was on post #7404494, I'm not sure what to do with it.

Veraducks said:

It seems like a pool likely related to topic #26639 was made, pool #22382.

Given that I found it because it was on post #7404494, I'm not sure what to do with it.

It should just be nuked. It's a concept that should just be a tag if we're going to do anything about it, not a pool, and the pool only exists because the creator refuses to just accept when we're not going to do what they want and keeps trying to do things behind people's backs. Which is why they got demoted.

The bulk update request #25593 (forum #278353) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #25737 (forum #278901) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #25870 (forum #279263) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #25871 (forum #279264) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The_Bob said:

BUR #26018 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

mass update pool:4243 -> character_food
nuke pool:4243

How about this?

This should really be character-shaped food or character-themed food, to avoid being confused with creature as food.

Edit: forum #280243.

The bulk update request #26018 (forum #279812) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #26143 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nuke pool:22382

As above.
Why do we have this?

MegaFlare said:

BUR #26143 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nuke pool:22382

As above.
Why do we have this?

Looks like it was made for topic #26639, though it should've been a favgroup, but mistakes happen

岩戸鈴芽 said:

Looks like it was made for topic #26639, though it should've been a favgroup, but mistakes happen

They only created the pool after the thread stalled, and didn't bother to tell anybody they created it. They also gave it a description, which favgroups don't support, so it wasn't an accident. Wouldn't be the first time they tried to sidestep the forums.

blindVigil said:

They only created the pool after the thread stalled, and didn't bother to tell anybody they created it. They also gave it a description, which favgroups don't support, so it wasn't an accident. Wouldn't be the first time they tried to sidestep the forums.

I know. I meant more like, they possibly weren't aware of the favgroup approach. And creating it later could be down to them realizing the automated approach wasn't going to happen.