santander said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5165055
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6301488
1st one I feel is G, unsure about the 2nd
Posted under General
santander said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5165055
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6301488
1st one I feel is G, unsure about the 2nd
santander said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5165055
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6301488
Reposting from the linked thread:
blindVigil said:
The posts were already rated S, so I removed child and readded flat chest, for the reasons you outlined in your previous comment. I didn't feel strongly that the rating should be changed, so I tagged it by its rating at the time.
santander said:
When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)
kittey said:
When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)
I feel like these are right on the border considering the character's apparent age, so I have no problem with S, but I do think cases like these are still worth bringing up here since there are a few users that will take "when in doubt" to unreasonable extremes.
Blank_User said:
I feel like these are right on the border considering the character's apparent age, so I have no problem with S, but I do think cases like these are still worth bringing up here since there are a few users that will take "when in doubt" to unreasonable extremes.
kittey said:
When in doubt, choose S. I’d leave them at S to be on the safe side. (Pun not intended.)
Thanks. So I shouldn't change the tags at all/remove the flat chest one, then?
c_spl said:
seems S
It's not seems if characters literally in underwear/bikini like that
feel like the cameltoe is subtle enough for S
c_spl said:
feel like the cameltoe is subtle enough for S
I'd agree if there wasn't a full 2 seconds of the camera looking right at it. When the perspective wants you to look at it, I hesitate to call it subtle.
post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?
Blank_User said:
post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?
The boob socksand miniskirtmake it S, i think 🤔
Blank_User said:
post #5779780
Mentioned in a recent feedback as being an example of G. I switched it to S a few months ago because of the emphasis on the breasts, but it was changed back. I still think it's eligible for S. What does everyone else think?
I don't really see an emphasis on the breasts here, it's just a character with large breasts. IMO this is G