Posted under General
Admiral_Pectoral said:
I would say they fall under the muscular shota fetish. I've seen similar content before and that's what artists called it.
Not sure how the shota tag works in these cases tbh.
Agreeing it's muscle shota, it'd probably be similar to oppai loli in that it's childlike but not actually needing a shota tag. We don't have a good tag for it though and I definitely don't think it should have the muscular child tag.
Top result in scan. This is probably loli, right? post #7089308
hdk5 said:
The proportions are a bit short, but I think that's only because of the viewing angle.
Unbreakable said:
Some of the artist's works have heavy focus on the feet, but by itself, this image seems pretty tame. Not sure if it's safe enough for G, though.
nkuylo said:
Proportions are borderline, but I'm leaning towards yes.
post #7104936 and child.
Bionicman76 said:
Top result in scan. This is probably loli, right? post #7089308
Is that a no then?
Blank_User said:
post #7104936 and child.
More chibi than loli. (Yes Im looking at the large one.)
post #7104843, doesn't really feel loli to me.
post #7110970
I tagged it aged up, but other user added loli and age difference, both of which feel wrong to me.
hdk5 said:
post #7110970
I tagged it aged up, but other user added loli and age difference, both of which feel wrong to me.
I'm not sure aged up or age difference should be used for that post, but it's definitely not loli.
I didn't add it but I'll ask for confirmation here
post #5851784 is wrongly tagged loli
post #7122515 - loli?
c_spl said:
I didn't add it but I'll ask for confirmation here
Childish but not child like.
punished_K said:
post #7122515 - loli?
No, just big head.
