Posted under Tags
BUR #17140 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication aqua_border -> border
create implication gradient_border -> border
create implication multicolored_border -> border
Despite not having so many posts, I think those still need implications.
The bulk update request #17140 (forum #242698) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #22113 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication lace_border -> ornate_border
create implication lace_border -> lace
create implication ornate_border -> border
create implication transparent_border -> border
A continuation to previous topic #24933. I actually wonder if this should better be implied with ornate border (while does not still imply border).
World_Funeral said:
BUR #22113 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication lace_border -> ornate_border
create implication lace_border -> lace
create implication ornate_border -> border
create implication transparent_border -> borderA continuation to previous topic #24933. I actually wonder if this should better be implied with ornate border (while does not still imply border).
Changed lace border to point to ornate border.
The bulk update request #22113 (forum #263715) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
