BUR #21628 has been rejected.
create implication commission_watermark -> watermark
It is a type of a watermark.
Posted under Tags
BUR #21628 has been rejected.
create implication commission_watermark -> watermark
It is a type of a watermark.
This tag seems pretty useless to me. Why do we need a tag specifically for the word "commission" being superimposed? Wouldn't someone want to search for commission watermark instead, which returns any kind of invasive watermarks due to commissions?
BUR #21885 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update commission_watermark -> commission watermark
nuke commission_watermark
As above. Useless tag padding.
The bulk update request #21628 (forum #261580) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #21885 (forum #262749) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Should we get rid of sample watermark too then?
That tag, at least, has some utility in removing more obnoxious watermarks that cover the whole picture. It used to be called sample before, and it was renamed for clarity, but it would probably be more useful to have a generic tag for the kind of watermark that covers a whole picture and is a detriment to it without restriction on what the watermark actually says. watermark has become too diluted with random barely noticeable signatures over the years to be of any use for that.