Campy00 said:
body type is clearly loli + image looks risque enough, especially with the ass + suggestive dialogue
That is a prime example of the failings of the child tag.
Posted under General
Campy00 said:
body type is clearly loli + image looks risque enough, especially with the ass + suggestive dialogue
That is a prime example of the failings of the child tag.
Blank_User said:
post #6897041
Was tagged with loli twice, but I don't think any age difference is apparent from this image alone. Even if they were, are we even allowed to tag *other* characters with loli or shota?
Agreed with blindVigil, I don't see anything here that would qualify it for loli.
Blank_User said:
post #6897041
Was tagged with loli twice, but I don't think any age difference is apparent from this image alone. Even if they were, are we even allowed to tag *other* characters with loli or shota?
blindVigil said:
I can't see anything that would qualify that for loli
I dunno what you all aren't seeing that I am. I thought it was fairly obvious with how they are drawn, especially in proportion to Aoji, that they were meant to be seen as presumably loli, knowing this artist. I don't see any reason this post shouldn't be treated differently compared to other NSFW art of this character. And let me tell you, I am not happy about a post like this dodging my blacklist because of a technicality.
The only reason I tried tagging it loli was because I'm pretty sure we didn't have a tagging equivalent for it meant for 1other characters. As I was fairly certain a tagging situation like this was incredibly rare, I thought it would work as a good "alternative" for that sort of thing, at least in this instance.
So what are you all not seeing here? I'll let it go if I have to, but I would like an explanation for why this shouldn't be tagged something like loli.
Updated
Maiden_in_Orange said:
I dunno what you all aren't seeing that I am. I thought it was fairly obvious with how they are drawn, especially in proportion to Aoji, that they were meant to be seen as presumably loli, knowing this artist. I don't see any reason this post shouldn't be treated differently compared to other NSFW art of this character. And let me tell you, I am not happy about a post like this dodging my blacklist because of a technicality.
The only reason I tried tagging it loli was because I'm pretty sure we didn't have a tagging equivalent for it meant for 1other characters. As I was fairly certain a tagging situation like this was incredibly rare, I thought it would work as a good "alternative" for that sort of thing, at least in this instance.
So what are you all not seeing here? I'll let it go if I have to, but I would like an explanation for why this shouldn't be tagged something like loli.
How the artist normally draws a character isn't relevant. This post and only this post is what matters. You can barely see Shion's body, and not enough of it to determine actual proportions. Nothing about them looks like a loli (or shota).
Seem that some drawing from this artist aren't properly tagged loli (all of them are suggestive)
post #6451635
post #6613968
post #6404492
post #6071522
post #5765663
post #5273179
post #5273066
post #5272534
post #4743317
post #2959666
post #3817798
denliner27 said:
Seem that some drawing from this artist aren't properly tagged loli (all of them are suggestive)
post #6451635
post #6613968
post #6404492
post #6071522
post #5765663
post #5273179
post #5273066
post #5272534
post #4743317
post #2959666
post #3817798
I fully agree with the last 7 and added the tag to them. Not sure about the first four; the characters look slightly older but still close to the border.
Jerr said:
I think that qualifies.
Actually, speaking of furry-loli-pee, I wonder now if my first ever upload here (post #5999508, post #5999494, post #5999517) qualifies for the second, as it was tagged `young` over on e6
hdk5 said:
Actually, speaking of furry-loli-pee, I wonder now if my first ever upload here (post #5999508, post #5999494, post #5999517) qualifies for the second, as it was tagged `young` over on e6
They look Lolish to me if that's what you're asking.
The loli tag was added by the artist, which is also the uploader.
VR-Man said:
The loli tag was added by the artist, which is also the uploader.
The artist made the right call, though it should've been rated Q for the nipples visible under the see-through shirt.
What makes this one not loli:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6953691?q=player193
But this and it's children loli?:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6953748?q=player193
How much change in body type to get past that line? Is it because most lewd Minowa Gin pics here are loli rated?
Does post #6848101 count as loli? Petite seems more appropriate to me.
LightSolas said:
Does post #6848101 count as loli? Petite seems more appropriate to me.
I agree
Plenty_of_Poi said:
What makes this one not loli:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6953691?q=player193
But this and it's children loli?:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6953748?q=player193
How much change in body type to get past that line? Is it because most lewd Minowa Gin pics here are loli rated?
I saw the posts on the front page while not logged in and thought they would likely qualify. The character in post #6953748 (which I did not see at the time) has slightly more breast development, which for me is just enough for me to say it shouldn't be tagged, but there are posts tagged with loli that show similar overall development. I can also see the overall body shape being used to justify removing the loli tag from post #6864637 and children, but I recognize they are still borderline. However, her body seems slightly more mature in those than in the posts I tagged, so if the former qualify for loli, the latter should as well.
The closer you get to the border, the more subjective factors will influence how users tag posts, so some inconsistency should be expected for borderline cases.
post #6956953 and child
I tend to avoid tagging loli if only the face visible, but some may disagree.
hdk5 said:
I tend to avoid tagging loli if only the face visible, but some may disagree.
I wouldn't tag those either. There was a similar case at the top of this page.
Not sure if post #6960538 is enough to count.
Also, the posts under a lokulo_no_mawashimono lokulo-chan loli search. Some of them definitely qualify, but many of them (particularly the ones focusing on memes such as post #6901309 and post #6900890) seem like the character's appearance could plausibly be justified by being chibi or deformed rather than young.