Posted under General
I feel like this could be reconsidered, the works of artist with the same style have been posted here before, it's just the artist's style
post #6826146
Also request these to be reapproved
post #6934845
post #6934801
post #6934781
post #6934650
post #6938031
Updated
Is there something wrong with post #6936416, post #6936417 and post #6936443? I don't see why they wouldn't be approved
Updated
Hello, could you please tell me why this picture was deleted? post #7385526
Please consider reviewing it again.
Updated
post #6862294
post #6833032
post #6832966
post #6824931
What's the issue with these; is it just the older art style? I know some elements of 00s anime art like thicker black lines (as a result of scanning physical inkwork), less saturated colors, big poofy/spiky hair, etc are somewhat the opposite of what's popular today, but imo these are extremely good for fan art from 2005-2006. Besides other pieces from this artist that have been approved, Danbooru does host images in this style (provided they were uploaded when they were new), ex. post #80914. Are users discouraged from uploading unofficial art from this era? It's one of my favorite styles, I feel that it deserves preservation.
Updated
Why was this deleted? It had 8 likes
Also, what is wrong with these posts?
I'd appreciate some feedback on post #6805948
I have the impression it got overlooked for being hand-drawn, but these aren't amateur lines. It's up there with other stuff in the graphite tag.
And her arms are just really good (their multiplicity aside). It's rare. I couldn't find something comparable on danbooru so I'd be happy if we could have it here.
(I also spent a lot of time on the tags, but I understand that doesn't really matter here)
Hello, could you please tell me why this picture was deleted?
post #6727094
Please consider reviewing it again.
Updated
For the following image https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6940290?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AFreshblink I was wondering why it was not approved in this case since everything else from this artist has been uploaded. I don't see any clear or obvious anatomical mistakes, the hands, eyes and body seem to look good to. Is it just the theme or composition
The other one I am curious about is this one https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6940593?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AFreshblink because the parent image here https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6939927?q=akikawa_%28akikawa_0421%29 was approved in the past. The artist is the same, the artstyle is the same, quality appears to be the same. Only difference really is the positioning of the character and I think enough changed to justify a child post here. To me it would make most sense if the pair images got approved instead of just one of them.
Updated
Why not post #6210335? I believe it has sufficient quality. Compared to the same artist's work that is approved around the time of this upload, I find it at a similar level.
Updated
So post #6908346 keeps getting rejected but post #6911620 was quickly approved....
?????
Kronnang_Dunn said:
post #6911620 was quickly approved....
It wasn't approved, it was uploaded by an unrestricted user. Also: don't compare your uploads with other uploads. post #6908346 is a complete different theme compared to post #6911620
Nacha said:
It wasn't approved, it was uploaded by an unrestricted user. Also: don't compare your uploads with other uploads. post #6908346 is a complete different theme compared to post #6911620
And yet, same character. Waaaaaaay diifferent quality.... and still not approval.
Updated
post #6943336
post #6942453
post #6942714
post #6942878
post #6942846
just curious. Why those 5 were not approved? this character has very few art anyway (even on website like pixiv) so digging up stuff from some deepths of internet or untagged pixiv art and sharing on biggest image websites could be nice popularity/spotlight boost
Nerom said:
post #6943336
post #6942453
post #6942714
post #6942878
post #6942846just curious. Why those 5 were not approved? this character has very few art anyway (even on website like pixiv) so digging up stuff from some deepths of internet or untagged pixiv art and sharing on biggest image websites could be nice popularity/spotlight boost
post #6943336: The only one that doesn't seem to be doing anything wrong, besides not bothering to import the artist commentary.
post #6942453: Unsourced; Your own third-party edit, potentially against the rules.
post #6942714: Added your own commentary instead of the artist's; Kinda meh quality.
post #6942878: Unsourced; A pixel-perfect duplicate of a post that received a take-down request.
post #6942846: Unsourced; Given the state of the other ones, not surprised if this one's an edit or a paid reward.
Not sourcing your uploads is a good way to get them ignored by approvers, especially if they look like they could be against the rules.
Hello, could you tell me why these images were removed?
post #6708002
Please consider reviewing it again.
Updated
post #6941226
post #6941232
post #6941236
What did the approvers not find interesting about these three here?
Hello, could you tell me why this images was removed?
post #6825540
Please consider reviewing it again.
Updated
Leaving another batch for judgement.
post #6930121
post #6930134
post #6948066
post #6948101
This one I'm less inclined to fight for. It looks okay to me for the most part, although the spine does look a bit off for the pose. I've seen worse though, so I'll just leave it here in case someone thinks it's good enough.
post #6939665
