Posted under General
post #6536871, post #6530520, post #6524906, post #6522474 are barely rating:s, let alone loli;
these edits probably need a second look;
Veraducks said:
That you have to even ask for one like that is almost comical.
How so? I was in doubt myself, but since they looked kinda tall to me, I decided not to tag it in the end.
genshinfanti said:
Is this post loli? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6862438?q=user%3Ahdk5
I would say so.
Unbreakable said:
Gonna say no. Don't agree with several other edits by that user, either.
pancakes11 said:
I'm leaning toward yes, mainly because the covered navel and the hip creases kind of makes it look like she's not wearing anything underneath her dress.
Is post #6872872 loli? Or is this another case of the tag editor tagging something that isn't loli as loli? I personally don't believe La+ is a loli,
I think, like Gura, she is just very small with a small (but not flat) bust
Updated
TheGamingRodent said:
Is post #6872872 loli? Or is this another case of the tag editor tagging something that isn't loli as loli? (I don't believe La+ is a loli, I personally
think, she just like Gura, is just small very a small bust)
Agreed that this one isn't loli. Keep in mind whether a picture qualifies depends purely on how it's drawn, not on how a character is usually drawn or any canonical features.
This user seems to be adding loli to a lot of non-loli posts.
Comments are currently disputing the loli tag on post #6869769.
feline_lump said:
Comments are currently disputing the loli tag on post #6869769.
I wouldn't tag that as loli. It probably got tagged as such because of the flag.
Should this be tagged as loli? If I'm remembering right, Nayuta is like an elementary or middle schooler in canon. Plus in the dialog Makima is talking down to her like she's a child and outright calls her "little girl" in the first page, and it's emphasizing the fact that Nayuta needs a stepstool to try and match her height.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Should this be tagged as loli? If I'm remembering right, Nayuta is like an elementary or middle schooler in canon. Plus in the dialog Makima is talking down to her like she's a child and outright calls her "little girl" in the first page, and it's emphasizing the fact that Nayuta needs a stepstool to try and match her height.
Canon age is not a factor in tagging loli, as stated on the wiki, and in this image she isn't drawn particularly childlike.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Should this be tagged as loli? If I'm remembering right, Nayuta is like an elementary or middle schooler in canon. Plus in the dialog Makima is talking down to her like she's a child and outright calls her "little girl" in the first page, and it's emphasizing the fact that Nayuta needs a stepstool to try and match her height.
Canon is never relevant for tagging loli/shota, Makima talks down to everyone, and "little girl" doesn't exclusively mean "child." Physical appearance should be the only thing being considered, and Nayuta here doesn't look like a child to me.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6897235?q=plus_step
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6897239?q=plus_step
Should tag loli or not? Leaning yes but want other opinions.
Plenty_of_Poi said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6897235?q=plus_step
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6897239?q=plus_step
Should tag loli or not? Leaning yes but want other opinions.
Especially the first pic is drawn quite loli-esque, so it's probably better to err on the side of caution here.
post #6897041
Was tagged with loli twice, but I don't think any age difference is apparent from this image alone. Even if they were, are we even allowed to tag *other* characters with loli or shota?
Blank_User said:
post #6897041
Was tagged with loli twice, but I don't think any age difference is apparent from this image alone. Even if they were, are we even allowed to tag *other* characters with loli or shota?
I can't see anything that would qualify that for loli
body type is clearly loli + image looks risque enough, especially with the ass + suggestive dialogue
Updated
