Posted under General
I hate the idea of a child image popping up, I’ve Black listed all the tags I can (open to new blacklist tags I can use if y’all have any ones), but the ones I’ve looked at don’t have anything marked, How do I stop this shitty site from having child( and children-like) posts from popping up?
kittey said:
Blacklist child. FYI, actual loli posts are already hidden from you.
If you think this is a shitty site, you can just leave, y’ know…
Child has been blacklisted, same with young and loli, however they don’t get tagged with loli, but 15-20%~ is still children, just not marked, I can go to post instantly and show you what I mean, I just have to know how to give reference to a post,
Might leave tbh, haven’t been able to find a good site that’s like e621… but for Anime and not furries
To reference a post, you can either copy its link, for example:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6727297
Or, preferrably, copy its ID, and format it like this:
Referring to a post like this
post #6735308
Where something is sexually implied, but no tags are there to block it,
Thebadblender said:
I think the best option would be to Black list small breasts, petite doesn’t seem to work, let me know if you have any other suggestions
Flat_chest and Kindergarten_Uniform come to mind as other ones. If there are any characters and copyrights that have characters you run into too often you might just want to full-on blacklist those.
zetsubousensei said:
Flat_chest and Kindergarten_Uniform come to mind as other ones. If there are any characters and copyrights that have characters you run into too often for you might just want to full-on blacklist those.
Added to the Black list, thanks for the suggestions, the feed is looking better off than it was before now!
I would suggest blacklisting all of Blue Archive if you want to be extremely safe.
BobTheBuilder_v1 said:
I would suggest blacklisting all of Blue Archive if you want to be extremely safe.
To expand on this, Blue Archive has a problem of people not tagging loli when it should be, post #6735308 you linked being a perfect example of that, so it's likely best to avoid that entire tag if you want to be safe.
岩戸鈴芽 said:
To expand on this, Blue Archive has a problem of people not tagging loli when it should be, post #6735308 you linked being a perfect example of that, so it's likely best to avoid that entire tag if you want to be safe.
another suggestion would be looking through this list of character tags and blacklisting any of them that are Q or E
something like "illyasviel_von_einzbern is:nsfw" should work i believe
I don't know whatever retarded definition of loli you people keep in your heads, but you should stop poisoning the tag with your nonsense.
Read the wiki I linked, then again take a look at post #6735308 that you referenced, compare it to other examples categorized as adolescent (you know, not loli), and you'll see that it fits right in.
And if you've got a problem with this definition - that's your issue to deal with, not the tag's problem, so I kindly ask you be sure to respect and follow it here.
hdk5 said:
I don't know whatever retarded definition of loli you people keep in your heads, but you should stop poisoning the tag with your nonsense.
Read the wiki I linked, then again take a look at post #6735308 that you referenced, compare it to other examples categorized as adolescent (you know, not loli), and you'll see that it fits right in.
And if you've got a problem with this definition - that's your issue to deal with, not the tag's problem, so I kindly ask you be sure to respect and follow it here.
I dunno who pissed in your cereal but that's pretty loli to me, and I see you overusing the tag all the time so I'm not sure what room you have to be so hostile.
And if you've got a problem with this definition - that's your issue to deal with, not the tag's problem, so I kindly ask you be sure to respect and follow it here.
Your reply ends like there's some site-wide consensus that has already been reached regarding this. If so, please link it, because currently it seems like you want the entire site to follow your personal standards regarding loli tagging. Blue Archive specifically has been brought up often, especially on the Discord, but also in topic #8650, regarding untagged loli, to the point where blue_archive -loli ai:loli is a pretty reliable way to find untagged loli posts.
blindVigil said:
... I see you overusing the tag all the time...
I am aware of that, as you're not the first one who pointed that out.
I promise to be more careful with my future uploads and tag loli much less than I do now.
岩戸鈴芽 said:
Your reply ends like there's some site-wide consensus that has already been reached regarding this. If so, please link it, because currently it seems like you want the entire site to follow your personal standards regarding loli tagging. ...
You can view the loli wiki page history yourself. All "not loli" examples were added there by back-then-approver-level (=trusted) user in 2017. I don't know what events led to them being put in there (if there were any), but the fact that it stayed there for over 6 years while being seen by our benevolent red-named people multiple times over that period is enough for me to consider what written there as the site-wide definition.
hdk5 said:
I am aware of that, as you're not the first one who pointed that out.
I promise to be more careful with my future uploads and tag loli much less than I do now.
Please refrain. You are already the focus of an effort spanning at least eight Builders+ in varying capacities because you don’t tag loli enough. It’s gotten to the point where overzealous application of loli is actually a lesser evil, because users like yourself are the reason why Danbooru Gold will never see the light of day again.
You can view the loli wiki page history yourself. All "not loli" examples were added there by back-then-approver-level (=trusted) user in 2017. I don't know what events led to them being put in there (if there were any), but the fact that it stayed there for over 6 years while being seen by our benevolent red-named people multiple times over that period is enough for me to consider what written there as the site-wide definition.
Assuming Danbooru wikis are infallible is folly. Loli in particular cites two posts for child that not only don’t have the tag but are also S (child solo is never), and a whole slew of “adolescent” posts which is a term that has never existed as a tag on Danbooru (read: petite) and is in many cases simply soft loli. Not to mention how ridiculously old the examples are, so all you’re proving is that the loli wiki needs to be brought to-date.
Also, no user level is inherently “trusted”. People can have poor judgment, that’s why asking for second opinions is valuable.
You can also add aged down to your blacklist. Also, I'm not sure whether you want to block all posts with children or just the NSFW ones, but if you want to see the SFW posts, put -rating:g (minus sign included) on the same line.
blindVigil said:
I dunno who pissed in your cereal but that's pretty loli to me, and I see you overusing the tag all the time so I'm not sure what room you have to be so hostile.
I can see hdk5's point about post #6735308 being adolescent. To me, the proportions and small breasts (change your contrast settings if you can't see them) make the character resemble a young teen. I'm not confident enough to say it shouldn't be tagged loli, but it does seem to fit in with the adolescent posts in the wiki.
Of course, that's not a very strong argument if the posts are categorized incorrectly. I agree with BobtheBuilder v1 that they should be double-checked. We should also add more descriptive guidelines to the wiki. We should have plenty of information from the loli/shota check thread to work with by now.
