Posted under Tags
BUR #18850 has been rejected.
create implication sucking_both_nipples -> sucking_on_multiple_breasts
Unless I’m missing something, this is a square/rectangle situation. For example, sucking_on_multiple_breasts could involve a single person sucking one breast each of two different people, but sucking_both_nipples would always also be sucking_on_multiple_breasts.
Most male characters do not have breasts. Sucking both nipples is a general tag that applies to any character. Just looking through the search I could find numerous examples of male characters in this situation like post #5345757 and post #6414677
I think the only problem with this implication is that nipples is used for female and male both, instead breasts is only for female characters (male have pectorals, manboobs, etc. tags, i think?). And if the previous statement is correct, then (breasts tag have a bunch of wrongly tagged post.)
So creating the implication is not feasible, if you see there are some post inside sucking_both_nipples that cannot be inserted into the sucking_on_multiple_breasts tag. (Also, those post maybe are wrongly tagged, maybe they go into a male version of double breast sucking tag, anatomy is science, after all.)
Correct me if I'm wrong, not really an expert on the male-oriented tags...
Edit: admiral ninjed me, sorry I'm a slow writer
We don't need to combine "one character sucking both of a person's nipples at the same time" with "one character sucking the nipples of two different people at the same time" with "two characters sucking the nipples of the same person at the same time". These are three distinctly different situations.
Perhaps sucking both nipples should be renamed to something like "both_nipples_sucked", to make it clear that it's passive rather than active. It's easy to see why someone would find it identical to sucking on multiple breasts.
The bulk update request #18850 (forum #249714) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
