BUR #17333 has been rejected.
nuke own_cum_in_mouth
nuke own_cum_on_tongue
Covered by autofacial cum_in_mouth search.
Posted under Tags
BUR #17333 has been rejected.
nuke own_cum_in_mouth
nuke own_cum_on_tongue
Covered by autofacial cum_in_mouth search.
post #4024239 isn't autofacial. Further, someone performing autofellatio and ejaculating into their own mouth (e.g. post #254274) shouldn't count for autofacial if it doesn't actually get onto their face.
blindVigil said:
post #4024239 isn't autofacial. Further, someone performing autofellatio and ejaculating into their own mouth (e.g. post #254274) shouldn't count for autofacial if it doesn't actually get onto their face.
But it's not guaranteed to be drinking own cum by TWYS.
TWYS isn't ironclad, sometimes you can just make a reasonable assumption based on context clues. There's a dick that's recently ejaculated and a glass full of cum, 1+1= that cum came from that dick.
Besides, post #5882422 isn't autofacial either, and there's no reason to think that's someone else's cum given the context.
Something like this post #2073572 could be seen as drinking your own cum, without being autofacial. I would also include it into TWYS, because it's the whole context of the image. I think it's a niche tag that should be looked at, before nuking it. I have no opinion on the other 2.
The bulk update request #17333 (forum #243578) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.