Posted under General
The list of commonly misused tags states that male swimwear and topless male should not be used to describe the same person.
The topless male wiki states that it can be used for characters "wearing pants, shorts, male swimwear or male underwear without a shirt or other upper-body clothing."
This is a clear contradiction. Which one is correct?
Blank_User said:
The list of commonly misused tags states that male swimwear and topless male should not be used to describe the same person.
You can usually safely discard these "list of" wikis when they try to tell you to tag in a counterintuitive way. I've removed that line.
I'm not sure where to ask this but sailor dress wiki states it's mutually exclusive with serafuku, i just want to know if it is actually in effect, in which case i will update the serafuku wiki, otherwise it's the sailor dress wiki which needs updating.
I just feel like it's gonna be needlessly hard to keep those separate in practice
it shouldn’t be, they are very distinct. post #6334324 could only ever be called a sailor dress because it’s a dress with serafuku elements. if the hem of the garment isn’t visible (due to cropped torso, out of frame, etc) leave it at serafuku + the relevant clothing tag. serafuku subsets are extremely prone to mistagging — look at how many people don’t understand how to use [color]_serafuku — but I would be very opposed to merging these tags.
also yeah, it’s a good idea to add an exclusion to the serafuku wiki.
BobTheBuilder_v1 said:
it shouldn’t be, they are very distinct. post #6334324 could only ever be called a sailor dress because it’s a dress with serafuku elements. if the hem of the garment isn’t visible (due to cropped torso, out of frame, etc) leave it at serafuku + the relevant clothing tag. serafuku subsets are extremely prone to mistagging — look at how many people don’t understand how to use [color]_serafuku — but I would be very opposed to merging these tags.
also yeah, it’s a good idea to add an exclusion to the serafuku wiki.
Really i agree with you here, and it was precisely after seeing some misuse of some (color)_serafuku, including in a school uniform wiki, that this came to my mind. I'm just not being very optimistic about managing to limit consistent mistags.
But okay, updating wikis.
Would like a wiki for fat rolls, perhaps with examples of what counts and what doesn't. There's some stuff that kind of looks like fat rolls on people that are maybe just slightly plump and otherwise beautiful. I probably wouldn't tag it if it doesn't stand out, but it would be good to know exactly what they are
Fulfilled perfectly by user #739901 (bob)
Updated
Looks to be a recent (or at least resurfaced) trend among fanartists of drawing characters crushing watermelon between their thighs. A wiki would help for those checking its entry.
Resolved.
Updated
Recently made a wiki for blue plate special which is a type of oral sex act. Someone changed all the entries and renamed it to blue plate special (sex) while I was tagging but at least they manually moved everything for me.
Haven't really seen anything tagged like that other than trombone (sex act) so I was going to change it back but I guess it's more descriptive. It's not really an ambiguous tag so I couldn't see it being used for any other reason but let me know what you guys think. If we do keep it that way shouldn't it be changed to (sex act) for the sake of standardization?
Also, some help tagging new pics for it would be great if you're interested in it lol.
Sakasuke said:
Recently made a wiki for blue plate special which is a type of oral sex act. Someone changed all the entries and renamed it to blue plate special (sex) while I was tagging but at least they manually moved everything for me.
Haven't really seen anything tagged like that other than trombone (sex act) so I was going to change it back but I guess it's more descriptive. It's not really an ambiguous tag so I couldn't see it being used for any other reason but let me know what you guys think. If we do keep it that way shouldn't it be changed to (sex act) for the sake of standardization?
Also, some help tagging new pics for it would be great if you're interested in it lol.
I found the wiki daisy chain (sex) tagged that way as well so maybe it is the proper way to format it... But then why is the trombone wiki not done that way?
Sakasuke said:
Recently made a wiki for blue plate special which is a type of oral sex act. Someone changed all the entries and renamed it to blue plate special (sex) while I was tagging but at least they manually moved everything for me.
Haven't really seen anything tagged like that other than trombone (sex act) so I was going to change it back but I guess it's more descriptive. It's not really an ambiguous tag so I couldn't see it being used for any other reason but let me know what you guys think. If we do keep it that way shouldn't it be changed to (sex act) for the sake of standardization?
Also, some help tagging new pics for it would be great if you're interested in it lol.
Blue-plate special has a specific meaning not related to sex, and the sex position is named after it. In cases like these it makes sense to have a qualifier.
nonamethanks said:
Blue-plate special has a specific meaning not related to sex, and the sex position is named after it. In cases like these it makes sense to have a qualifier.
Oh, didn't know that. But what about conformity? Should it be (sex) or (sex act)? Not that it's a big deal but it would be nice if everything matched.
Some explanation could be good.
Is this distinct from ladle?
The_Bob said:
Is this distinct from ladle?
Ladle is actually a general tag, if we want to go into the details a sauce ladle tag is required. Soup ladles are typically more circular and have a deeper scoop (post #2553941) than the wider, shallow sauce ladle (post #2538508).
Unbreakable said:
That tag appears to exist solely for Dio Brando.
