TrueKringe said:
Right breast looks odd, the low resolution and non-web raw file source makes it a red flag to me.
also hair strand fading into the background, and the general blobby contours of otherwise unnaturally "clean" rendering
Posted under General
TrueKringe said:
Right breast looks odd, the low resolution and non-web raw file source makes it a red flag to me.
also hair strand fading into the background, and the general blobby contours of otherwise unnaturally "clean" rendering
8253803 said:
As a matter of fact though, I do believe most work, if not all, that AztoDio published after this work is ai-assisted.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/103941962
And I've tagged them accordingly. The only one I'm not so sure about is post #6103972.
Artist is confirmed to use mostly raw AI for backgrounds, and the visuals here are consistent with that.
Hereinafter said:
That style clash is strange. I assumed that Kazuma seems to be hand-drawn into AI-generated Megumin given the artist's past works. I don't know whether this can really be qualified as "AI-assisted" or not given that half of the image is AI drawing.
post #6261085
Her hands, the patterns on her armor and underwear, and just the overall style look AI Generated to me
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
post #6261085
Her hands, the patterns on her armor and underwear, and just the overall style look AI Generated to me
It's definitely suspicious that the same artist draws the chest armor decorations very differently. post #6016054
Someone flagged this as AI and now I'm confused, what do you think?
sadodere said:
Someone flagged this as AI and now I'm confused, what do you think?
The belt buckle, and that blue plume thing on her chest look a weird and melty? Like compare them to the official design here
sadodere said:
Someone flagged this as AI and now I'm confused, what do you think?
it's just melting all over the place, melty spots all over the cloth rendering, and the hair also melts where it's in thinner strands, one of those litterally fading into the background
sadodere said:
Someone flagged this as AI and now I'm confused, what do you think?
If the creator did not even fix the artefact and discontinuities in her hair right between her eyes, where people's attention often fall on, then this image is, as close as makes no difference, fully ai-generated.
The following is just my personal opinion: the bare minimal requirement for ai-assisted should be zero artefact/error/blur throughout the entire character.
Watermark indicates that it was generated using ourt-ai website. It looks like the only redrawing that has been done is adding the distinguishing character features, namely the halos, the hairpiece, and the cheek-star-thing, all of which are much crisper than the rest of the image, which appears to be untouched. I added both the ai-generated and ai-assisted tags, as I'm not sure which best applies here.
MysteriousLounger said:
Watermark indicates that it was generated using ourt-ai website. It looks like the only redrawing that has been done is adding the distinguishing character features, namely the halos, the hairpiece, and the cheek-star-thing, all of which are much crisper than the rest of the image, which appears to be untouched. I added both the ai-generated and ai-assisted tags, as I'm not sure which best applies here.
Well, if the "artist" simply fix minor details on an AI art and not using it as a based for their drawing, then it's AI-generated.
MysteriousLounger said:
Watermark indicates that it was generated using ourt-ai website. It looks like the only redrawing that has been done is adding the distinguishing character features, namely the halos, the hairpiece, and the cheek-star-thing, all of which are much crisper than the rest of the image, which appears to be untouched. I added both the ai-generated and ai-assisted tags, as I'm not sure which best applies here.
Slightly related but I thought Pixiv was suppose to have an A.I tagging system? If an image like that got uploaded but the user refused to say it was A.I, does it mean Pixiv's moderation never penalized rule breakers?
Throwaway9999 said:
Slightly related but I thought Pixiv was suppose to have an A.I tagging system? If an image like that got uploaded but the user refused to say it was A.I, does it mean Pixiv's moderation never penalized rule breakers?
It's honor-system based, I think. You have to specifically check a box saying whether it's AI generated or not when you upload stuff.
As for punishment? I don't know, but there's lots of AI-generated/assisted works not tagged as such.
anonbl said:
Artist claims to have used AI for the character, which seems plausible. The rest of the image is 3D-rendered with no hints of AI.
Throwaway9999 said:
Slightly related but I thought Pixiv was suppose to have an A.I tagging system? If an image like that got uploaded but the user refused to say it was A.I, does it mean Pixiv's moderation never penalized rule breakers?
I hate how hard it is and how ineffective it seems to be to report people who don't tag AI art!
Currently, there is no option about AI among Pixiv's report reasons. I always select "other violations" and type something about "not tagging AI" in the text field.
You also need to pay for premium to mute more than one artist.
Someone just flagged the post as AI-generated but there was no AI tag on the pixiv, and artist doesn't specify it was AI generated.
Otherwise I have no idea