Off-topic, not anime related content - western copyrights, western artist.
Someone should tell the flagger, that this is a poor reason. The image is kinda meh anyway.
Posted under General
Off-topic, not anime related content - western copyrights, western artist.
Someone should tell the flagger, that this is a poor reason. The image is kinda meh anyway.
Four posts flagged for AI despite first not being tagged so and then getting the AI-assisted tag. I dont particularly like the images but the flaggs seems frivolous.
apology for Nazism
Duplicates aren’t a valid flag reason, plus it was uploaded years earlier.
Cattywampus said:
Duplicates aren’t a valid flag reason, plus it was uploaded years earlier.
It's only not a valid flag reason if it's from a first-party source. We delete dupes from third-party sources or with no sources all the time.
Updated
Squishy said:
> AI with typical dead eyes and 6fingered broken hand
I wouldn’t call that vandalism because the image is very obviously AI-assisted: an AI base with several redrawn areas with visible brush strokes, plus a grain layer on top to make the edits look less out of place.
post #6099782 post #6099751 post #6099739 post #4475755 post #6099732
Would someone like to message them how the banned artist process works? Thank you.
Updated by RaisingK
Can someone please tell the pesky flagger that images from non-animanga copyright is now gradually acceptable while quality check is still mandatory? Cannot the flagger even understand the tag Wiki? Let's judge from the downvote ratio. I think it's extremely ironic when the user who flagged such posts might have a lot of deleted posts or having privilege to unlimited uploads, while most of his/her uploads are indeed NSFW stuff which should be uploaded with consideration. Thanks in advance. I am not going to say that gun name tags are seriously underpopulated compared to s*x acts.
Which part of post #6134037 is considered bad quality? Details on the vehicles? So basically only moderators and admins can see who flagged posts?
Updated
World_Funeral said:
Can someone please tell the pesky flagger that images from non-animanga copyright is now gradually acceptable while quality check is still mandatory? Cannot the flagger even read the tag Wiki? Let's judge from the downvote ratio. I think it's ironic when the user who flagged such posts have a lot of deleted posts or having privilege to unlimited uploads, while most of his/her uploads are indeed NSFW stuff which should be uploaded with consideration. Be careful.
While this is ironic coming from you, this isn't the thread to be making assumptions about some random user that you don't even know because you can't see who flagged it. You need to cut it out with the random insults in your forum posts.
Which part of post #6134037 is considered bad quality? Details on the vehicles? So basically only moderators and admins can see who flagged posts?
This is also not the upload feedback thread, post it there instead. And yes, only mods and admins can see flaggers because of users like you who show hostility toward them.
World_Funeral said:
Can someone please tell the pesky flagger that images from non-animanga copyright is now gradually acceptable while quality check is still mandatory? Cannot the flagger even read the tag Wiki? Let's judge from the downvote ratio. I think it's ironic when the user who flagged such posts have a lot of deleted posts or having privilege to unlimited uploads, while most of his/her uploads are indeed NSFW stuff which should be uploaded with consideration. Be careful.
I would personally consider that off-topic. Things don't need to be anime related to be on-topic, but that doesn't mean we should just allow everything. Also, please stop making this personal, just like you were told regarding furry, just because you don't personally appreciate it doesn't mean people should be discouraged from or judged for uploading it.
Which part of post #6134037 is considered bad quality? Details on the vehicles? So basically only moderators and admins can see who flagged posts?
Didn't we explain that at least once already? Yes, because we don't need people being harassed because other people take this stuff way too personally.
Anyway, imo I think the piece is overall below our quality standards.