Posted under Tags
BUR #14997 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication buttjob_over_clothes -> buttjob
create implication buttjob_under_clothes -> buttjob
I'm populating buttjob over clothes, and created buttjob under clothes in the similar vein as other explicit *_under_clothes tags.
EDIT: Removed after buttjob -> buttjob for instances like post #4437617.
Updated
post #4437617
After buttjob without buttjob.
Nacha said:
post #4437617
After buttjob without buttjob.
That's true... I'll remove that implication.
I don't even think most of the posts currently tagged as after buttjob should be. They all still have the guy's dick between the girl's asscheeks, it's just that he is nutting/has nutted. For after tags the action should be over, period.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
I don't even think most of the posts currently tagged as after buttjob should be. They all still have the guy's dick between the girl's asscheeks, it's just that he is nutting/has nutted. For after tags the action should be over, period.
But the cum is over the girl's panties, not directly on her skin and genitalia. Is there any other situation where that can happen other than a buttjob?
I don't mean the aforementioned post #4437617. I mean posts like post #5112950 - the dick is still between the cheeks, so it's still during the buttjob, the guy is just nutting.
In fact, only 2 posts tagged as after_buttjob are really "after", those being post #4437617 and post #2540060 (though not sure if it's necessarily a buttjob or just plain old anal).
I thought the act was finished in post #5112950. I guess it's a matter of interpretation, but it looks like a situation that either needs to be better defined or deprecated.
The angle in post #2540060 is such that it could look like either after anal or after buttjob. I'd go with the more well-populated after_anal to be safe, at least until after_buttjob's definition is much clearer.
The bulk update request #14997 (forum #232619) has been approved by @evazion.
