BUR #13444 has been rejected.
create implication hair_tie_in_mouth -> hair_tie
Currently all scrunchie tags imply the base scrunchie type, it seems logical to do the same for hair ties.
Posted under Tags
BUR #13444 has been rejected.
create implication hair_tie_in_mouth -> hair_tie
Currently all scrunchie tags imply the base scrunchie type, it seems logical to do the same for hair ties.
Previous topic #17483 topic #15294
Unbreakable said:
Previous topic #17483
Why is that aliased? Seems odd that scrunchie_in_mouth is aliased to hair_tie_in_mouth, but hair_scrunchie is not aliased or implied to hair_tie.
Edit: After reading through topic #15294 I understand the original discussion, but having a separate scrunchie_in_mouth tag seems more consistent even if its a small number of posts
Updated
The bulk update request #13444 (forum #226741) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.