Renaming the hair_on_breasts tag

This has popped up a couple of times in other topics and in comments, so I figured it's time I made a proper topic for it.

Frankly, a lot of people seem to think that the tag hair_on_breasts sounds silly. For me, it simply conjures up the entirely wrong mental image. As such, I hereby propose that the tag be renamed to something like hair_over_breasts.

Opinions? Alternative suggestions, perhaps?

That does seem like a sensible suggestion to me. You're quite right; the current tag does elude to a slightly odd image, the details of which shouldn't need discussion.

In short: +1.

hair_over_breasts is definitely better than hair_on_breasts, +1 from me too. I can think of one alternative (hair_covering_breasts), since hair_over_breasts might suggest that the hair is in front of, but not lying on top of the breasts, and it seems this tag is only used when the hair is the only thing from keeping the breasts exposed (so, covering them).

But honestly I think it's a pedantic distinction--hair_over_breasts is shorter and perfectly fine.

+1 hair_over_breasts

It is consistant with hair_over_eyes and hair_over_one_eye.

Makes sense, so +1 vote for hair_over_breasts as well.

Aliased to _over_

Edit: Covering does sound a lot better but I can think of situations where it wouldn't be "covering" them necessarily and splitting it into two tags would be overkill.

Hair on breasts sounds (to me, anyway) like the hair is actually growing on the breasts. Gross (to me, anyway).

@jjj14 What did you think when OP said "the entirely wrong mental image"?

This discussion bring to mind the images where long hair is used to cover the nipples effectively censoring the image. Is there a tag that covers that as well to differentiate it?

This discussion bring to mind the images where long hair is used to cover the nipples effectively censoring the image. Is there a tag that covers that as well to differentiate it?

censor hair