Posted under General
I have a question regarding proper way to rate images of sad, sobbing, crying characters - especially solo ones. Should they be instantly rated sensitive like these posts? Despite nothing is visibly suggestive, no visible self-harm, no suicidal actions, and the characters are fully-clothed. For instance:
post #4078392 post #1791747 post #5219117 post #5034527 post #4954579
Is that because of the whole depressive imagery?
When the old "safe" rating was split into sensitive and general, all the old posts were automatically put into rating:sensitive, so you'll find a lot of old posts that should be rated G but are S instead. See forum #213188 for context.
Feel free to fix them when you come across them. Those posts are all G, so I changed their rating.
VR-Man said:
All of them were posted before rating G existed, and all posts you linked here are G.
Oh sorry, someone has already fixed it immediately. Thank you for your advices. Anyways, why is on post #1791747, multiple_hairpins was removed despite the character is clearly seen wearing more than one hairpin?
World_Funeral said:
Oh sorry, someone has already fixed it immediately. Thank you for your advices. Anyways, why is on post #1791747, multiple_hairpins was removed despite the character is clearly seen wearing more than one hairpin?
They look more like hairclips.
Unbreakable said:
They are.
Oh my God, I have been tagging several Tateyama Ayano pictures inaccurately. Thanks! Despite sometimes those can be narrow enough to be called hairpins. For instance, her hairclips look narrower (having thin bodies) on post #5865186 or post #5794630.
Updated
World_Funeral said:
Oh my God, I have been tagging several Tateyama Ayano pictures inaccurately. Thanks! Despite sometimes those can be narrow enough to be called hairpins. For instance, her hairclips look narrower (having thin bodies) on post #5865186 or post #5794630.
I think you're misunderstanding what hairpins are.
blindVigil said:
I think you're misunderstanding what hairpins are.
I think I incorrectly identify that hairclips are typically, visibly hollow and triangular. While hairpins used to look like narrow strips.
Do pictures of characters wearing sleeveless dress which can left the armpits exposed like this (post #5883083) should be rated sensitive for not being fully-clothed enough?
ion288 said:
Sleeveless is usually fine for G but armpits can be S.
Edit: Never mind, seems that I've gotten the answer from another. Thanks in advance.
Updated
Currently S, but I feel like Q might be better?
The_Bob said:
Currently S, but I feel like Q might be better?
Yes, that's definitely Q.
A lot of recent hiroi_kikuri posts are marked as sensitive. Her character design does often feature a strap_slip; is this by itself enough to warrant a "sensitive" rating?
ex: post #5938316, post #5933685, post #5931231
Omo_Fan said:
A lot of recent hiroi_kikuri posts are marked as sensitive. Her character design does often feature a strap_slip; is this by itself enough to warrant a "sensitive" rating?
ex: post #5938316, post #5933685, post #5931231
While not all strap slip are immediately S, the examples you gave should definitely stay S, not only are they strap slip, the cloth is very loose and you can almost see her breast.
Unbreakable said:
I don't see any reason to rate that S. Do we just rate the presence of breasts as sensitive now?
@AngryZapdos seems to just be mass rating everything in ribbed sweater with unobscured breasts as Sensitive. There is nothing in post #6027108 or post #6016346 that warrants S. The breasts are not being focused on, there's nothing suggestive, and the characters are fully clothed.
blindVigil said:
@AngryZapdos seems to just be mass rating everything in ribbed sweater with unobscured breasts as Sensitive. There is nothing in post #6027108 or post #6016346 that warrants S. The breasts are not being focused on, there's nothing suggestive, and the characters are fully clothed.
The clothing hugs the breasts and they are, as you mentioned, largely unobscured. They are also not out of the way (in the background, off to the side etc.) in either post.
