goggles_x -> eyewear_x implications

BUR #11520 has been rejected.

create implication goggles_on_head -> eyewear_on_head
create implication goggles_on_headwear -> eyewear_on_headwear
create implication goggles_removed -> eyewear_removed

Goggles are a type of eyewear.

This would seriously pollute trying to find glasses or sunglasses on head. Eyewear was intended to be an umbrella tag for glasses+sunglasses, nothing more.

Then at least we shouldn't call goggles "eyewear" in the wiki.

A tag named "eyewear" not being intended for all types of eyewear was a bad idea from the start. Reminds me of how chokers, collars, and scarves weren't classed as neckwear despite being things you wear on the neck.

Talulah said:

A tag named "eyewear" not being intended for all types of eyewear was a bad idea from the start. Reminds me of how chokers, collars, and scarves weren't classed as neckwear despite being things you wear on the neck.

Scarves weren't? Wow, that's like the first thing I think of when I think "neckwear".

If anything we should probably split the eyewear tags into glasses and sunglasses rather than lumping more stuff on an ambiguous tag. Maybe keep it around for weird stuff that is otherwise hard to define.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #11520 (forum #218009) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.