Donmai

imply two-tone_* -> multicolored_*

Posted under Tags

BUR #11369 has been rejected.

Show

create implication two-tone_dress -> multicolored_dress
create implication two-tone_shirt -> multicolored_shirt
create implication two-tone_fur -> multicolored_fur
create implication two-tone_skirt -> multicolored_skirt
create implication two-tone_bikini -> multicolored_bikini
create implication two-tone_ribbon -> multicolored_ribbon
create implication two-tone_swimsuit -> multicolored_swimsuit
create implication two-tone_gloves -> multicolored_gloves
create implication two-tone_hairband -> multicolored_hairband
create implication two-tone_headwear -> multicolored_headwear
create implication two-tone_bow -> multicolored_bow
create implication two-tone_leotard -> multicolored_leotard
create implication two-tone_coat -> multicolored_coat
create implication two-tone_cape -> multicolored_cape
create implication two-tone_hoodie -> multicolored_hoodie
create implication two-tone_footwear -> multicolored_footwear
create implication two-tone_panties -> multicolored_panties
create implication two-tone_bodysuit -> multicolored_bodysuit
create implication two-tone_shorts -> multicolored_shorts
create implication two-tone_sweater -> multicolored_sweater
create implication two-tone_bra -> multicolored_bra
create implication two-tone_pants -> multicolored_pants
create implication two-tone_kimono -> multicolored_kimono
create implication two-tone_necktie -> multicolored_necktie
create implication two-tone_neckerchief -> multicolored_neckerchief
create implication two-tone_vest -> multicolored_vest

Most wikis refer "two-tone_*" as a sub type of "multivolored_*", and some tags like two-tone hair, two-tone skin and two-tone jacket already have this implication.

I left out two-tone legwear because it seems that we're trying to replace *_legwear tags with more specific tags.

BUR #11370 has been rejected.

create implication two-tone_bowtie -> two-tone_bow
create implication multicolored_bowtie -> multicolored_bow
create implication multicolored_bowtie -> bowtie
create implication multicolored_hairband -> hairband
remove implication two-tone_hairband -> hairband
create alias two-tone_hat -> two-tone_headwear
create alias two-tone_yukata -> two-tone_kimono
create implication multicolored_neckerchief -> neckerchief
create implication sweater_vest -> vest
create implication two-tone_sweater_vest -> two-tone_vest
create implication waistcoat -> vest

additional BUR

I dislike the amount of tag bloat here. Something simple like Yagokoro Eirin's red-and-blue dress gets 6 tags: dress, red dress, blue dress, two-tone dress, multicolored dress, multicolored clothes. With this every two-color piece of clothing will get at least 6 tags.

Serval's bowtie will get up to 14 (!) tags: bowtie, traditional bowtie, bow, print bowtie, print bow, orange bowtie, orange bow, white bowtie, white bow, two-tone bowtie, two-tone bow, multicolored bowtie, multicolored bow, multicolored clothes. And people do tag it this way too: serval_(kemono_friends) two-tone_bowtie white_bowtie orange_bowtie traditional_bowtie.

White or black with another color isn't supposed to count as multicolored, but that's how two-tone is often used. For example, Bremerton (Scorching-Hot Training)'s outfit is often tagged two-tone shirt and two-tone skirt, even though it's just a green-and-white tennis uniform. Multicolored is supposed to be for multiple "real" colors, like red-and-green, not green-and-white. Otherwise everything not 100% solid colored would be considered multicolored.

Should the already existing implications of multicolored_* for two-tone_skin, two-tone_hair and two-tone_jacket be removed? I am curious as to why the rest of two-tone_* tags don't have the same implication.

I believe magcolo wants to link two-tone_* and multicolored_* together since the implications already exist on some of them; this would make the tag system more coherent, but bloated as evazion stated.

Removing the existing implications of multicolored_* for two-tone_skin, two-tone_hair and two-tone_jacket would be the better option, as most of two-tone_* tags don't have the implications.

oslo said:

Should the already existing implications of multicolored_* for two-tone_skin, two-tone_hair and two-tone_jacket be removed? I am curious as to why the rest of two-tone_* tags don't have the same implication.

I believe magcolo wants to link two-tone_* and multicolored_* together since the implications already exist on some of them; this would make the tag system more coherent, but bloated as evazion stated.

Removing the existing implications of multicolored_* for two-tone_skin, two-tone_hair and two-tone_jacket would be the better option, as most of two-tone_* tags don't have the implications.

Yes to removing from two-tone jacket.

hair and skin might be worth treating differently, though.

1