BUR #10665 has been rejected.
create alias single_pantsleg -> single_leg_pants
God awful counterintuitive name
Posted under Tags
BUR #10665 has been rejected.
create alias single_pantsleg -> single_leg_pants
God awful counterintuitive name
Should note though that the single_pantsleg tag is also used for bodysuits with only one leg (ex: post #5018932, post #5013641). Also was used for post #2108911 with overalls with one leg as well.
NWF_Renim said:
Should note though that the single_pantsleg tag is also used for bodysuits with only one leg (ex: post #5018932, post #5013641). Also was used for post #2108911 with overalls with one leg as well.
People have been also tagging single-leg bodysuits with asymmetrical_bodysuit
Mexiguy said:
People have been also tagging single-leg bodysuits with asymmetrical_bodysuit
Kind of overly broad given the asymmetry could be anything from a missing sleeve, missing pantsleg, incompletely covering one half of the torso, etc.
I can't say I agree with single pantsleg being used for bodysuits or anything that aren't pants though, even if asymmetrical bodysuit isn't the best name, at least it's more accurate than using single pantsleg for it, calling it asymmetrical legwear would be a stretch also. Given that we have single leg pantyhose already, single leg bodysuit or similar wouldn't be that bad, I believe. If it happens to be necessary to create a tag for this, I can't think of another way tbh.
Would that then include removing any cases of where shorts are missing a pantsleg? Seems very rare, but an example does exist post #4880876.
This seems to be a acceptable stretch compared to bodysuit, we probably don't want to create single_* tags for every kind of clothing. That said, it also doesn't make sense to alias the name to single leg pants anymore if we're allowing this stretch, despite both having the same meaning, looks like there's isn't much to gain from it.
The bulk update request #10665 (forum #214351) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.