BUR #9609 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename sayori_(character) -> sayori_(sayori_(neko_works))
I'm not sure whether this or something else. sayori_(sayori_(nekoworks)) sounds weird.
Posted under Tags
BUR #9609 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename sayori_(character) -> sayori_(sayori_(neko_works))
I'm not sure whether this or something else. sayori_(sayori_(nekoworks)) sounds weird.
sayori_(sayori) also sounds weird imo, and doesn't seem that useful as a qualifier. sayori_(sayori_(neko_works)), while I agree sounds weird, makes it more clear it's a OC that belongs to sayori_(neko_works). the least weird sounding option is the current way the tag is named, sayori (character), but I think we never use "(character)" qualifier for original characters...
What about sayori_(sayori,_neko_works)? Exceptional situation probably need exceptional clarity
741qwe852asd963zxc said:
What about sayori_(sayori,_neko_works)? Exceptional situation probably need exceptional clarity
, are not allowed in tag names.
Unbreakable said:
, are not allowed in tag names.
Sorry, what about sayori_(sayori;_neko_works)?
741qwe852asd963zxc said:
Sorry, what about sayori_(sayori;_neko_works)?
If i have to choose between sayori_(sayori_(neko_works)) and sayori_(sayori;_neko_works), i think i'll choose the former.
No need to go against the current standard.
How about sayori_(neko_works)_(character)?
The bulk update request #9609 (forum #209285) has been approved by @nonamethanks.