Posted under Tags
BUR #9337 has been rejected.
create implication tearing_up -> tears
You shouldn't be able to have this without visible tears. I would ask for crying to imply it as well but there are images where you cant tell someone is crying without seeing tears, but I don't think this is true of tearing up.
After checking about two pages of posts with "tearing_up -tears", all of these posts have visible tears, yet none are tagged with it.
Same thing with "crying -tears", with a few possible exceptions, because I can't see the face, or the tears are fairly low down, making it look like sweatdrops.
Fukumoto has a very distinct expression for tearing up that doesn't involve concrete tears: post #4933662
lllIllllIllllIll said:
Fukumoto has a very distinct expression for tearing up that doesn't involve concrete tears: post #4933662
I'd argue that the "droopy" part of the eye is the tear. Also, the facial expression looks more like dread, than crying, but I don't know the show, nor the context.
I have never understood how this tag is different from a tears -crying search, and no one has been able to explain it to me so far.
MiiaBestLamia said:
I'd argue that the "droopy" part of the eye is the tear. Also, the facial expression looks more like dread, than crying, but I don't know the show, nor the context.
That's more of a teardrop.
Unbreakable said:
I have never understood how this tag is different from a tears -crying search, and no one has been able to explain it to me so far.
happy tears is not always crying
tearing up can be used for crying, but it can also be used for embarrassment, or comedic sadness/pouting w
I'm not familiar at all with its actual tagging usage, but I've always thought tearing up described someone who is about to cry, or beginning to cry. In the former of those cases, there won't be tears yet. Similar to how have to pee generally doesn't overlap with actual peeing; by analogy to this, tearing up can essentially be seen as 'have to cry'. Again, just to me; or how I think the tag would best be used.
The bulk update request #9337 (forum #207936) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
