BUR #9302 has been rejected.
nuke guardian_chara
Other than their all being very small, there seem to be no consistent visual traits across this group of characters that justify having its own tag.
Posted under Tags
BUR #9302 has been rejected.
nuke guardian_chara
Other than their all being very small, there seem to be no consistent visual traits across this group of characters that justify having its own tag.
This tag works like fairy_(kancolle). It's for those tiny fairies.
nonamethanks said:
This tag works like fairy_(kancolle). It's for those tiny fairies.
Why not just use fairy?
They don't look like normal fairies with wings or any other indicator of them being a fairy (like a glow around them, etc). The fairy tag is honestly misused cause people use it for either canon tagging (post #5200799, post #5189214) or using it for things that would be better suited for just the minigirl tag (post #3971718).
The_Bob said:
Why not just use fairy?
post #388091 doesn't look like a fairy to me.
I don't think it needs to be nuked, maybe expand the wiki to make it clear that it's related to a specific copyright?
Because guardian chara is easier than doing shugo_chara! ~miniboy ~minigirl. Most of their pictures aren't even tagged with either of those tags.
nonamethanks said:
Because guardian chara is easier than doing shugo_chara! ~miniboy ~minigirl. Most of their pictures aren't even tagged with either of those tags.
Okay, I'll buy that for a dollar.
The bulk update request #9302 (forum #207782) has been rejected by @The_Bob.
