Oppai challenge and Flashing implication

BUR #9303 has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

create implication oppai_challenge -> flashing

Oppai challenge is breasts flashing in public places.

I believe the usual consensus is that it's better not to imply challenges to tags because there will always be the odd exception, but i can't seem to find any here.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #9303 (forum #207806) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

It's literally just showing your tits in public without getting caught. Read any japanese article/wiki and they'll tell you that the West started the "fad" and calls it "public flashing". Surely there's a better tag name than it.

JoesT said:

It's literally just showing your tits in public without getting caught. Read any japanese article/wiki and they'll tell you that the West started the "fad" and calls it "public flashing". Surely there's a better tag name than it.

It's more specific than that. It usually is portrayed as flashing a single breast in a restaurant, but it's not exclusive to that.
Also, the pixiv tag is おっぱいチャレンジ (lit. "oppai challenge"), what else would you propose renaming it to?

If mtu virus can imply multiple views then this can imply flashing too.

post #3228859, post #3269189, and post #4123586 might count for the challenge, but there's zero background detail for flashing.

Hillside_Moose said:

post #3228859, post #3269189, and post #4123586 might count for the challenge, but there's zero background detail for flashing.

Maybe the second post, but the others feature elements that to me are enough to suggest a public setting. More importantly than that, though, flashing doesn't say anything about it needing to be in public or that anyone needs to be around to see it. The viewer can also be the one getting flashed, which doesn't require any sort of background.

blindVigil said:

More importantly than that, though, flashing doesn't say anything about it needing to be in public or that anyone needs to be around to see it.

Yeah, that would be public indecency.

Hillside_Moose said:

post #3228859, post #3269189, and post #4123586 might count for the challenge, but there's zero background detail for flashing.

If that's not flashing then we have a bigger problem: simple_background flashing has 500 results (even when you remove things like multiple views). That's more than double the amount of posts under this tag.

I'm convinced by blindVigil's argument, so as long as no one suggests implicating flashing -> exhibitionism or public_indecency (and you know someone will) we should be fine.

The bulk update request #9303 (forum #207806) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.