Deletion appeal thread

BiZzAr0 said:
Then don't look at them.

Oh, thats a brilliant strategy! Insult the people who you are appealing the post to.

(also, as a tip, I'm one of the more lenient of Janitors. If I don't like it, the chances of someone else approving it are very slim)

Fencedude said:
Oh, thats a brilliant strategy! Insult the people who you are appealing the post to.

(also, as a tip, I'm one of the more lenient of Janitors. If I don't like it, the chances of someone else approving it are very slim)

What are you talking about? I'm not trying to insult you.

Thanks for telling me what a Nude Filter is jxh2154 and
葉月. But I think this image should be appealed due to not being approved in 3 days.

http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/448972/blush-breasts-green_eyes-highres-long_hair-lying-n

No

Snesso said:
http://img1.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/b/3/19/944/19944367_worldrecord.jpg

1. They are still smaller (relatively to the entire body) than the images in question
2. They're still not what anyone would call normal body proportions, and given they're easily half the size of their bodies, they still fall afoul the ToS which lists that case specifically.

ohitsbrian said: Thanks for telling me what a Nude Filter is jxh2154 and 葉月. But I think this image should be appealed due to not being approved in 3 days.

That's not how rules work...

Please reconsider post #444963. Thanks.

post #449619
post #449621

Could you please reconsider deletion?

If you won't, at least, please tell me what was wrong in them. Maybe there was something I didn't notice... But at first sight, I think they are not bad pictures.

They're not-terribly-well-drawn porn. On both counts it means "not approving".

葉月 said:
They're not-terribly-well-drawn porn. On both counts it means "not approving".

I have seen porn pictures here that were drawn worse and were approved, but okay...

I would advise you refrain from using that justification, Sachiko.

Sachiko said:
I have seen porn pictures here that were drawn worse and were approved, but okay...

Every time I see this excuse, my latent psychokinesis powers (which I assume specialize in setting people on fire through the internet) come closer to awakening.

Please reconsider:
post #450010
post #449987
post #449957
post #449950
post #449942
post #449940

First 2 are by artist zero_hime, who I'm surprised hasn't been uploaded more.
Last 2 are by artist yuri_ai, so they might look a bit weird...

Kikimaru said:
Please reconsider:
post #450010
post #449987
post #449957
post #449950
post #449942
post #449940

First 2 are by artist zero_hime, who I'm surprised hasn't been uploaded more.
Last 2 are by artist yuri_ai, so they might look a bit weird...

You're surprised? I wouldn't have approved any of them.

Please reconsider:
post #450550
post #450531
post #450526
post #450521
post #450518

All 6 are from Theta of Ponkotsu Works, whom for the most part draws pretty good stuff. Thanks.

BrokenEagle98 said: All 6 are from Theta of Ponkotsu Works, whom for the most part draws pretty good stuff. Thanks.

Well, "for the most part". I found his stuff pretty mixed. It's mostly the faces that bother me. Something seems off there. I did approve some of them when they were initially posted though.

ATTENTION

You are not allowed to post in this thread unless you know what the word "appeal" means and how to use it in a sentence. Jesus.

Requesting the following be reconsidered:
post #450347
post #450351
post #450346
post #450337
I can understand if the last two are too sketchy/WIP for your tastes, but I really don't see anything wrong with the others.

Can post #451131 be reconsidered? The drawing is by bibi, although judging by the picture and the artist's style, I'm having doubts on this one.

Please reconsider the following, all worthy:
post #393365
post #407300
post #450451
post #381962
post #333210