gym_uniform → buruma?

Should there be an implication for that? It seems to me that a gym uniform by definition includes buruma, so it'd make sense to imply that, no?

I don't think there should be one. What if only the shirt is visible in the picture, or if it's a gym uniform with shorts instead of buruma?

It could work if it's the other way around. Buruma is a gym uniform after all.

Scanning through the 'gym_uniform' pics, I think an implication could be problematic. There are several images in there with running pants or bike shorts, and no buruma.

葉月 said:
Should there be an implication for that? It seems to me that a gym uniform by definition includes buruma, so it'd make sense to imply that, no?

Yes, making that change would be beneficial.

There are tons of Gym Uniforms in anime that don't include Buruma.

Fencedude said:
There are tons of Gym Uniforms in anime that don't include Buruma.

Thus if any implications are to be made, it would be better to go with Quess idea's above of buruma implying gym_uniform. Gym uniform works better as a catch-all if there needs to be one.

I thought buruma already did imply gym_uniform, I'm sure it used to. gym_uniform implicating buruma would imply that there is no male gym uniform, and there clearly is, and would discount tracksuit bottoms as Shinjidude says, and also girls wearing a gym top with nothing on their lower half.

葉月 said:
Should there be an implication for that? It seems to me that a gym uniform by definition includes buruma, so it'd make sense to imply that, no?

What the hell are you saying.

d

*smack*

Don't do that.

buruma -> gym_uniform used to exist but the two were practically synonymous. I guess shorts/jerseys are more common these days. I don't know.

This thread is from a year ago and probably shouldn't have been bumped.