Ratings check thread

Flopsy said:

post #4457929

I changed it to E, the uploader changed it back to Q. Her pussy and anus are clearly visible, and arguably the focus of the image.

Edit: post #4408841

I changed it to Q, Guaro changed it back to E. She's obviously masturbating, but it's not explicitly shown.

Masturbating should be E, most importantly because you can see fluids.

The first one is only one part of a lot of images with the same flare, rated as Q. anus pussy from_behind rating:q <- See here.
Given the howto wiki of rating, even Anus should be E, but I'm unsure about that. But, if you change the rating of that one image, please go ahead and check the others.

I don't understand why you treat the fact that some posts may be misrated (and some, like post #3666731, obviously are were, while e.g. post #4098034 seems fairly Q) as an argument for misrating another one. Nor do I accept any suggestion that a user who fixes one misrated post is somehow obliged to fix all the others as well. Provence has already changed post #4457929 back to E, and since I still think it looks more E than Q, I'll leave it like that. Ratings depend not just on what is shown, but also on how it is shown.

I haven't changed my mind about post #4408841 either. Discreetly portrayed masturbation or sexual intercourse is not necessarily E. The vote on that post is two to one against me, though.

Calling something misrated without a argument looks wrong to me.
Maybe my suggestion sounded wrong, but you seemed like someone who checks/gardens ratings on images, so I asked if you "please" can check them. You don't have to and I can't force you, of course.

post #4480957 (and her other artworks)

The way this artist draws leotards is questionable due to how little of the crotch they cover, but I'm gonna rate the less obviously sexual posts as Safe.

I uploaded post #4496541 with rating:s based on the "discreet, clearly non-sexual nudity" condition from howto:rate but I'd appreciate a second opinion since I'm not 100% sure if other people consider it discreet and clearly non-sexual too.

The art is rough in such a way that it looks like she's wearing a skin color leotard. I would keep it at Safe.

post #4521180
I rated it Q. Need a second check.

Keep it at Questionable. Those panties are pretty risque.

post #2790166
The rating said Safe, but I think the guy may make it count as guro. Or is the rating purely based on how sexual it is?

ziin1234 said:

post #2790166
The rating said Safe, but I think the guy may make it count as guro. Or is the rating purely based on how sexual it is?

Yeah, it's purely sexual-related.

post #4526181
I rated it Q.

I would rate it Safe. The only objectionable thing there are the covered nipples and they're not that obvious.

post #4034114

I think it's safe, but another user changed it to q twice.

I would say safe. There are no bodily fluids visible and you don't see her bare ass so it should be okay.

It's definitely Q under the provision for sexually suggestive disrobing.

My vote for Q too.

Unbreakable said:

post #4034114

I think it's safe, but another user changed it to q twice.

safe

Also leaning Q

I'd also say Q, it's definitely sexually suggestive and she is partly undressed.