BUR #4121 has been rejected.
remove implication cum_on_breasts -> breasts
Unless we want a cum on flat chest tag this implication needs to go. See: cum_on_breasts flat_chest.
Posted under Tags
BUR #4121 has been rejected.
remove implication cum_on_breasts -> breasts
Unless we want a cum on flat chest tag this implication needs to go. See: cum_on_breasts flat_chest.
nonamethanks said:
Unless we want a cum on flat chest tag this implication needs to go. See: cum_on_breasts flat_chest.
I´m open for a cum on chest or cum on flat chest tag, but if people disagree, then this implication needs to go.
BUR #4122 has been rejected.
remove implication breast_squeeze -> breasts
Another one: flat_chest breast_squeeze.
Well, flat chest grab exists to work around this problem with breast grab. We could do the same and make flat chest squeeze. Trying to squeeze your boobs together but they're too small is a thing worth tagging.
Honestly though the "flat chests don't count as breasts" rule doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I mean, cum on breasts still involves boobs even if they're tiny boobs. This either makes most breast-related implications invalid, or it forces us to create flat chest versions for every breast tag. It feels especially weird given that small breasts still count as breasts, and sometimes small breasts are almost as small as flat chest.
evazion said:
Well, flat chest grab exists to work around this problem with breast grab. We could do the same and make flat chest squeeze. Trying to squeeze your boobs together but they're too small is a thing worth tagging.
Had no idea this tag existed. Seems I'm not the only one, breast_grab flat_chest has 1k+ posts.
The bulk update request #4121 (forum #177034) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #4122 (forum #177036) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.