BUR #2872 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias layer_(bang_dream!) -> wakana_rei
create alias chu2_(bang_dream!) -> tamade_chiyu
create alias lock_(bang_dream!) -> asahi_rokka
create alias masking_(bang_dream!) -> satou_masuki
create alias pareo_(bang_dream!) -> nyuubara_reona
create alias universal_bullin_(azur_lane) -> universal_bulin_(azur_lane)
create alias trial_bullin_mkii_(azur_lane) -> prototype_bulin_mkii_(azur_lane)
remove implication belchan_(azur_lane) -> belfast_(azur_lane)
mass update yumesaki_kaede -> char:yumesaki_kaede_(game_club_project)
For BanG Dream, RAISE A SUILEN are finally coming to Girls Band Party, and they are referred by their real name there (on most part at least, they also referred with their stage name, but my point still stands). (I asked this again because as I said before, RAS finally added to the game when back then they weren't yet)
As for Azur Lane, while azurlane.koumakan.jp uses double L for their name, EN server (where most of the tags here are derived from except some alternate skins) uses single L (and for the last one, a different name).
For Belchan/Little Bel, the implication request was made because at the time there was no other younger shipgirls. But now there are more and no one has this implication to their older counterpart, I don't see this being needed for Belchan/Little Bel too.
On another note, I'm thinking to request aliases for all the alternate skins and younger KANSEN to matches their EN server counterpart as I said before, Danbooru mostly uses EN name for them. But that's for another time.
Edit: I have a plan to mass update yumesaki_kaede, adding the qualifier (game_club_project) to the character name to make way of artist currently known as kaede_(003591163) to be changed to his Twitter handle as I feel it looks better than stacc number.
EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #2872 (forum #168146) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
EDIT: The bulk update request #2872 (forum #168146) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by DanbooruBot