Posted under Tags
BUR #3154 has been rejected.
create implication heart_pendant -> heart
create implication heart_pendant -> pendant
-
EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3154 (forum #170513) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
What is the difference between a heart_pendant and a heart_necklace ?
Pendant's wiki states that :
Whereas a necklace is a chain of jewelry, a pendant is a piece of jewelry that is attached to a necklace, as to be the centerpiece.
The heart_necklace's wiki says :
A necklace with a heart-shaped jewel attached on the front,
Heart_pendant is used in post #4001948 or post #3222697, but it's heart_necklace in post #3967152 or post #3932895.
Rignak said:
What is the difference between a heart_pendant and a heart_necklace ?
Pendant's wiki states that :
The heart_necklace's wiki says :
Heart_pendant is used in post #4001948 or post #3222697, but it's heart_necklace in post #3967152 or post #3932895.
Thinking about it, I think heart necklace is the wrong term, since if the necklace is the chain itself, the heart attached to it will always be a pendant.
Does this mean heart_necklace should be aliased to heart_pendant (having heart_pendant imply necklace, pendant and heart)?
Same goes for star_necklace and similar ones.
I've thought about it and doing aliases is probably not the right way, as there might be pictures of pendants being used without chains, thus not being necklaces. Pendants can also be attached to bracelets and similar (post #662779).
This would however make the specific pendant tags skyrocket.
Perhaps something like
imply heart_necklace -> heart_pendant + necklace
imply star_necklace -> star_pendant + necklace
Thoughts?
The bulk update request #3154 (forum #170513) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
