Donmai

Pruning midriff

Posted under Tags

BUR #3094 has been rejected.

mass update underwear_only midriff -> -midriff

The wiki for midriff states that it is not to be used for characters who are nude, topless, or only wearing underwear or a bikini.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3094 (forum #169918) has been rejected by @Arcana55.

Updated by DanbooruBot

In regards to the wiki, I think the language may be too generalized in regards to the underwear specification. For instance, underwear includes both the camisole and the tank top, which can meet up with the panties such as in post #4010336, or be somewhat separated such as in post #3973530. For the case of the latter, I've been adding the midriff tag so that this particular differentiation can be searched. I'd like to see that stay, so I think the definition should be tweaked to exclude the combination with either the camisole or the tank top. Thoughts?

I could also see it being appropriate without other clothing (top and/or bottom) in cases where the focus is clear and direct on the midriff itself, e.g. some of the panels in post #2636605. It's an exception case, but I definitely think the tag should apply in that sort of situation.

this is really better as one of your own private searches for tag gardening rather than something needing bulk update

BrokenEagle98 said:

underwear includes both the camisole and the tank top, which can meet up with the panties such as in post #4010336, or be somewhat separated such as in post #3973530. For the case of the latter, I've been adding the midriff tag so that this particular differentiation can be searched. I'd like to see that stay, so I think the definition should be tweaked to exclude the combination with either the camisole or the tank top. Thoughts?

I added some language to this effect. I think what may make things clearer for people would be test cases/examples.

Updated

1