imply old/new_school swimsuit -> one-piece swimsuit

BUR #2656 has been rejected.

create implication old_school_swimsuit -> one-piece_swimsuit
create implication new_school_swimsuit -> one-piece_swimsuit

Those should always be one-piece swimsuits, since it refers to a specific design. If they're not they should be tagged with nontraditional school swimsuit instead.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2656 (forum #166552) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Previous topics: topic #9968 topic #9328

Also can we finally get rid of the colour_school_swimsuit tags we have since they are just a combination of school_swimsuit and colour_swimsuit tags? We even have alternate color school swimsuit.

What if there is a two-piece swimsuit that follows the visual design of the old_school_swimsuit (ex: post #121286)? I get that it's a nontraditional design, but it is also still based specifically on the old-school design.

NWF_Renim said:

What if there is a two-piece swimsuit that follows the visual design of the old_school_swimsuit (ex: post #121286)? I get that it's a nontraditional design, but it is also still based specifically on the old-school design.

I'm not sure I would tag that as old_school_swimsuit, and seems nobody decided to tag it with that either, but I understand the issue. The nontraditional school swimsuit tag is not very big, it's only 300 posts, but if there's more similar posts maybe a separate tag can be made specifically for such a bikini design?

In truth you can find most under nontraditional_school_swimsuit bikini -ro-500_(kantai_collection) - not sure it needs a specific name at all, given that's what nontraditional_school_swimsuit is for.

BUR #2657 has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

mass update white_school_swimsuit -> white_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication white_school_swimsuit -> white_swimsuit
remove implication white_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit
mass update black_school_swimsuit -> black_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication black_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit
mass update purple_school_swimsuit -> purple_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication purple_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit

As per unb's post. I can't read today.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2657 (forum #166557) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

nonamethanks said:

BUR #2657 has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

mass update white_school_swimsuit -> white_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication white_school_swimsuit -> white_swimsuit
remove implication white_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit
mass update black_school_swimsuit -> black_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication black_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit
mass update purple_school_swimsuit -> purple_swimsuit school_swimsuit
remove implication purple_school_swimsuit -> school_swimsuit

As per slime's post

Proposal seems fine, though I'll leave time for others to provide additional feedback.

nonamethanks said:

I'm not sure I would tag that as old_school_swimsuit, and seems nobody decided to tag it with that either, but I understand the issue. The nontraditional school swimsuit tag is not very big, it's only 300 posts, but if there's more similar posts maybe a separate tag can be made specifically for such a bikini design?

I think making a separate tag would be unnecessary, as I think the current number of school swimsuit tags is about right. Probably as long as there is a warning or something that the two style tags implicate one-piece swimsuit is I guess enough. As you said, no one tagged that image with old_school_swimsuit, so taggers at least don't seem to think it should be included in that grouping.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #2657 (forum #166557) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #2656 (forum #166552) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.