homeless_homo said: You like those nude filters, AND you're a janitor? That's a bad combination. No offense or anything though.
The best nude filter ever is still pretty bad. I'm more impressed with the vector work anyway, much like nude filters, vectors tend to be done by people without the talent to do anything else, but these are significantly better than the norm.
Shame they are wasted on nude filters.
Anyway, I didn't approve them, if that is what you are implying, they were uploaded by a contributor, so they bypassed the moderation filter.
I don't see why banning nude filters should be necessary. Just enforce the standards against low-quality images more strictly, and most nude filters will be gone anyway.
Magus said: I don't see why banning nude filters should be necessary. Just enforce the standards against low-quality images more strictly, and most nude filters will be gone anyway.
Probably because of this:
Fencedude said: ...uploaded by a contributor...bypassed the moderation...
Mods can always delete crappy posts by contributors. It's not as if once a post gets by the approval process it's guaranteed a permanent place on Danbooru.
Just a question I'm new here and I just put up a post but since you guys where talking about nude filters I just wanted to ask why are pics uncensored on the thumbnail but censored when click and viewed in the full size?
I just checked all nude filter pics and...yes they are 99% crap. In the other hand I selected a few that might have a chance or that not look that bad:
post #18301 <- not sure if it's a nude filter. post #35137 <- mmm this one is so-so. post #66025 <- not so bad. post #59891 <- not a fan of the serie but is better than some other pics. post #89427 <- idem. post #89426 <- idem. post #133942 <- not a bad "version" of the parent. post #126473 <- good reinterpretation of the parent. post #169243 <- good quality, clear and simple. without unnecesary detail. post #166083 <- also good quality. post #189104 <- no parent here so I can't really tell, it just looks like an ordinary artifacted image. post #233150 <- so-so. The parent is already hot. post #229927 <- not far from the parent. post #226044 <- very nice quality. post #228632 <- good uncensored work, not far from parent. post #247623 <- good work. post #321489 <- not really much difference from the parent. post #412354 <- no parent here. post #408154 <- This one wins against the parent, wich is more a big artifact than a pic.
Those are all I could find that more or less are worth keeping. Everything else I'm fine with deleting it. Tell me what you think.
albert said: There seems to be a consensus. I'll ban nude_filter. They'll still be available by searching status:deleted if you really want to see them.
Thanks albert, much appreciated.
And as always, if anyone finds something that should not have been tagged nude filter, do bring it up in the deletion appeal thread and it will be dealt with accordingly.
EB said: This one is not a nude filter. It is a game CG that was photoshopped to be uncensored.
post #228632 is the same way. post #412357 might be as well for all I know, since there's no parent.
post #32963 and post #33449 are censored game cg and not nude filters at all. But the latter is a duplicate and neither is of high quality, so they can stay deleted. But the point is that pictures were mistagged and mistakenly deleted by the blanket purge.
post #166083 ... yeah, that's still a nude filter (removing the top), but at least they cleaned up the parent scan and removed the text. Not that that probably amounts to anything here.