post #3717788
Second try and the reasons are there, but I begin to believe that this is a waste of time.. and the funniest thing is that today I found one of my old edits uploaded on yande.re uploaded here by someone else and it wasn't deleted..
Posted under General
post #3717788
Second try and the reasons are there, but I begin to believe that this is a waste of time.. and the funniest thing is that today I found one of my old edits uploaded on yande.re uploaded here by someone else and it wasn't deleted..
Konan-Beatrice said:
post #3735998
post #3735988 - proportions are the same as in other pictures of the same author (post #2734251, post #3736075, post #3004864), but they are approvedpost #3735985 - Do not approve of the post because of cartoon face painting?
post #3731716, post #3731759, post #3731736, post #3731725 - such a face painting is the style of this author, and I do not think that it is so bad that it should not be approved (post #3718473, post #3733433 for example)
post #3731727 - I don’t see mistakes at all. It seems to me that you are too nit-picking on pictures with men (The image from the post above was approved, but my post was not approved, seriously?)
And to other posts I have the same question.
For example, post #3736571. Maybe I need to add a tag "sketch" for you to approve it?post #3737707
post #3737709
post #3737717
post #3737722
post #3737799
post #3737835
post #3737855 - Will you talk about bad proportions again?post #3738453 and post #3738472 - The artist’s twitter posts were deleted before I found these images. I found only the link (https://www.zerochan.net/Hemoon) where this author was indicated. What should I do next? Or will you say bad proportions again?
Try acting less rude. Such replies are the reason why barely anyone replies to users in the first place. There's a high likelihood you get a somewhat, let's put it kindly, dissatisfied reply.
The replies may be short but that's probably because a big answer makes you look like a nitpicky assh****.
post #3735998 Thin arms, very large hand
post #3735988 Hands are larger than the forearms, which is not the case for post #2734251. She even wears gloves.
These posts fell victim to the "yaoi hands" where these get drawn way too big. It's off-putting.
post #3735985 The heads are also drawn in such a way that they'Re disconnected with the neck, especially good visible by the girl). And then the rest, besides the faces, look rather "real" while the faces look "cartoonish". There's a stylish "error" (for a lack of a better term).
post #3731736 looks weird because the upper torso looks bulky (also due to the armor so maybe that's not the main point here) but the buttocks and legs are super slim, not to speak of the walking. It looks like the right buttock is somehow detached from the other one.
The images in this large list can be summoned by one or two things, but it also boils down to poor proportions, yes.
Some are ok, some aren't.
post #3737709 HUGE hand and not even drawn that great. The violin is also way too tiny but that alone isn't the problem.
post #3738472 Again the hand, more specifically the one holding The Bible. I really don't get why the fingers have to be that large. Also due to perspective, the fingers point towards us, so they should be a bit short but they aren't. It also doesn'T help that it's the focus.
Really, it boils down to "way too big hands" for most of these images. Yes, males due have larger hands (probably) but sometimes artists are overexaggerating a bit too much.
undelete there, no you haven't seen it. sorry if its too hard for you, but after a few year you'd think you can do better.
post #3565791
post #3565574
post #3547732
post #3540453
post #3530596
post #3571741
post #3571740
post #3566704
post #3706319
post #3706329
post #3695581
post #3706316
post #3651570
post #3631518
post #3634712
post #3634702
post #3634703
post #3623757
post #3601926
post #3608305
post #3575752
post #3575762
post #3573885
post #3573891
post #3573890
post #3572716
post #3572718
post #3739644 a funny 3 panel strip. Maybe the anatomy is not to standards, but seems to have garnered some interest and discussion. I think it should have another look.
Lacrimosa said:
Try acting less rude. Such replies are the reason why barely anyone replies to users in the first place. There's a high likelihood you get a somewhat, let's put it kindly, dissatisfied reply.
The replies may be short but that's probably because a big answer makes you look like a nitpicky assh****.
Thanks for the constructive criticism. Just sometimes the impression is true that the moderators are too nit-picking. I apologize if I caused you any inconvenience and will continue to try to upload better quality images.
post #3728482
post #3737973
post #3318056
post #3533268
post #3680391
post #3482898
post #3052403
post #3522730
what's wrong with them?
Updated
Want to know why this wasn't approved.
Hello.
Maybe you can give me some feedback why this wasn't approved? I can think about only one reason - too "toonish". If so - welp.
It felt nice anyway.
+ this phrase is iconic for Priscilla:
>> Thou must returneth whence thou came.
This land is peaceful, its inhabitants kind, but thou dost not belong.
I beg of thee, plunge down from the plank, and hurry home.
Painted World of Ariamis: "get rolled over by skelewheels, burned to ashes by huge pustules, speared to death, etc". Priscilla is at the end of the "World". Still can't hurt her.
That was my reasoning for uploading.
Updated
Want to know why those weren't approved.
post #3719711
Still don't know what was wrong with this one.
@GhostZero, I'm not an approver, but I'd say it's also not that well-drawn. Also, your reasoning for uploading is something that would only resonate with fans of that series who know who Priscilla is and sympathise deeply with that character. I think you'll find that there aren't very many of that kind of person here.
post #3751776 is the full version of post #3560753, so I thought it was okay
post #3751728 is the non-patreon version of post #3748415, was it the watermark?
Lacrimosa said:
Really, it boils down to "way too big hands" for most of these images. Yes, males due have larger hands (probably) but sometimes artists are overexaggerating a bit too much.
I'm sorry, but this whole reply is honestly ridiculous. Most if not all of those images are perfectly fine, and even by "subjective" standards none of them have overly large hands, and certainly not comparable to "yaoi hands". To pair any of those images with the yaoi hands meme is just laughable. If those hands were any smaller than they currently are they would've been unapproved for being too small.
post #3533268
post #3318056
post #3728482
seeing the most of the artists's works are okayed, why were these unapproved?
post #3754661
post #3754693
post #3754684
post #3754672
post #3754695
May i ask, why these posts were deleted and can i somehow change them to be approved?
patauch said:
post #3754661
post #3754693
post #3754684
post #3754672
post #3754695
May i ask, why these posts were deleted and can i somehow change them to be approved?
Those faces are very weird-looking and end up falling into the uncanny valley.
patauch said:
so, there is no way they could get approved again?
By posting here you already got some approvers to look at them again, so if they still haven’t been approved, there’s nothing left for you to do about it.
I agree with nonamethanks; it’s mostly the faces. You should avoid uploading images from that artist.