[REJECTED] Tag implication mixed_bathing -> bathing

BUR #2248 has been rejected.

create implication mixed_bathing -> bathing

Reason: It's in the name of the tag.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2248 (forum #162314) has been rejected by @evazion.

This was previously rejected in topic #13403 because sometimes the characters are just having sex in a bathroom without doing much actual bathing. I see a fair number of posts under mixed_bathing -bathing that probably could be tagged bathing though.

Does that mean it should implicate bath instead?

That's even more of a stretch than the bathing implication. There are plenty of examples like post #2949964 and post #3245721 without a bath in sight.

The bulk update request #2248 (forum #162314) has been rejected by @evazion.

This should be tagged manually. It may be true in some cases (perhaps many), but not necessarily all. Anyone who feels up to it can go through mixed_bathing -bathing and add it where appropriate.