Posted under General
post #3717138
post #3717139
post #3717142
post #3717144
What's wrong with those ?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3717857
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3718775
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3718779
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3718784
I wish I knew what was so "wrong" with these this time.
DragonKnightGX said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3718775
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3718779I wish I knew what was so "wrong" with these this time.
The first Zoids piece has characters that look super awkwardly placed in their terrain. The girl's arms/hands are not in proportion with each other.
Second Zoids piece looks largely okay, but Jo's lips are kind of offputting to me.
Elfaleon said:
but Jo's lips are kind of offputting to me.
That's literally part of her character design.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/zoids/images/d/dc/Screen_Shot_2019-08-30_at_6.17.59_PM.png/revision/latest?cb=20190830084940
The alternate version was approved, but not this one?
What's wrong with those?
post #3718573
post #3718473
post #3698874
an older version of this image has long been approved, whats wrong with that one?
post #3698882
post #3168974
Konan-Beatrice said:
an older version of this image has long been approved, whats wrong with that one?
post #3698882
post #3168974
Just FYI, post #3168974 was never approved. It was uploaded by a user with unrestricted uploading privileges.
Could someone explain why post #3719849 wasn't approved?
From the Padoru arts, this one was well draw by a good artist, and there's a lot of other simpler Padoru edits which got approved.
lamialover97 said:
Could someone explain why post #3719849 wasn't approved?
From the Padoru arts, this one was well draw by a good artist, and there's a lot of other simpler Padoru edits which got approved.
It's got a weird fuzz around some of the edges of the linework that looks like artifacting or a bad scan quality to some degree. I personally found it hard to look at due to that.
The one drawn by artist #133009 doesn't appear any different from his other approved works, at least to me.
RMXFan102 said:
post #3718723 might have gotten a pass if it were more detailed or part of a multi-page comic. There's nothing wrong with an artist having a sketch-y style as long as they made an effort to make it look good, but the poorly-drawn hands and scribbly background don't do much to sell this image.
Updated
iridescent_slime said:
post #3718723 might have gotten a pass if it were more detailed or part of a multi-page comic. There's nothing wrong with an artist having a sketch-y style as long as they made an effort to make it look good, but the poorly-drawn hands and scribbly background don't do much to sell this image.
I see. I'll make an effort to look out for that sort of thing in future. Thanks.
They didn’t answer me what was wrong with the previous images. Okay.
post #3722479 - Artist deleted his post, I can not indicate the source. What to do next?
post #3722441
post #3722428
post #3722438
post #3722425
post #3722409 - what's wrong?
post #3718498 - Other art by this artist has been approved, what's wrong with this art?
Konan-Beatrice said:
post #3722479 - Artist deleted his post, I can not indicate the source. What to do next?
If you have the link to the source, just put it in the source field, even if its deleted.
post #3642305 - why did this version got unapproved? if SFW version is okay then NSFW should too, no?
post #3638233 - SFW version
I know i have upload my artwork https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3729135 but it unapproved and delete i know i am now improve my style but i need be polished artwork
but i need stylus to draw rather than my barehand so yeah i can't drawing artwork but i still can write the story instead
