Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

qme said:

Whats the problem now?

post #3706329
post #3706325
post #3706323
post #3706316
post #3706314
post #3706319

I'm guessing nothing as usual? You can undelete it now.

:rolleyes:.

1st: Awful legs, most notably the shanks.
2nd: Mediocre coloring, but I guess it's just above the treshold.
4th: Bad foot, wonky lines. Coloring doesn't help either and the face (mouth) looks completely misplaced. Overly skinny arms with way too long lower arms
5th: Generally not a good image with really flat coloring, weird faces (leftmost girl gives me shivers) and weird lifted leg that looks like it doesn't belong to the body
6th: mostly faces, eyes are way too high. The torso of two of the main girls looks also messed up with the way the clothes and breasts are drawn.

Blasterfight said:

post #3700706
post #3700707
post #3700710

Bad legs and feet on every image. The perspective doesn't look correct with how the legs are drawn compared to the upper body. Leg/Feet focus done wrong. It also doesn't help that shanks look disconnected to the thighs.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3709225
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3709170
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3703307

What about these?

post #3695456 was deleted and I don't get why. Could someone point to me what could be have made this art not approved please?

why is this post not being approved?
post #3709528

Both above posts show rather bad limb proportions. Very thin thighs or asymmetrical arms are just looking off. And for the latter: Explicit posts are more likely to get skipped over because of one "small" flaw.

As for the other post:
post #3709170 Bad hips (absolutely atrocious)

I wanted to ask why post #3710480 was deleted.
I accidentally posted the twitter sample previously of a much lower resolution and someone told me I had to fix that, so I thought that was the problem, but this one didn't get approved either.

I can't find anything wrong with the picture aside from it being "furry" and it's of the same or higher quality as the artist's other submitted work and work in the same category.
I'd really like to know if possible, thanks, especially since I see much lower quality work being accepted.

It's furry and those images are held to extremely high scrutiny here.
It's not really outstanding for being furry, so it was skipped when reviewing it.

Purrloin said:
I can't find anything wrong with the picture aside from it being "furry" and it's of the same or higher quality as the artist's other submitted work and work in the same category.

You've pretty much hit the nail on the head. I would probably have approved this. I doubt too many of the approvers are fans of Aggretsuko, and of those I can imagine secondary characters like Tsunoda being easily overlooked by non-fans.

Elfaleon said:

You've pretty much hit the nail on the head. I would probably have approved this. I doubt too many of the approvers are fans of Aggretsuko, and of those I can imagine secondary characters like Tsunoda being easily overlooked by non-fans.

Wait, so whether or not the post gets approved also depends on whether the approvers are AWARE the character exists? Not just art quality? Are you sure? That seems kind of unnecessary, what with the tag system and all.

RMXFan102 said:

Wait, so whether or not the post gets approved also depends on whether the approvers are AWARE the character exists? Not just art quality? Are you sure? That seems kind of unnecessary, what with the tag system and all.

And that'S how misconceptions are put into place.
It's true that known characters get approved faster (just look at Kantai Collection). However, the same doesn't apply to unknown stuff. You see thousands and thousands of posts that are from an unknown copyright on that side...approved.
Also all of your appealed images show characters that should be known and they still got deleted or stayed unapproved.

It's really not that simple.

It really has to do with the fact that it's mediocre furry art. And being mediocre isn't enough for furry stuff.

To be clear, I wasn't agreeing with what he said, I was just baffled to the point of asking for clarification. That poster implied that the character not being well-known was a factor in a post's deletion. If having a well-known character WERE enough to get a post approved, I wouldn't post here as often. But not to draw attention away from your complaint or anything :)

RMXFan102 said:

To be clear, I wasn't agreeing with what he said, I was just baffled to the point of asking for clarification. That poster implied that the character not being well-known was a factor in a post's deletion. If having a well-known character WERE enough to get a post approved, I wouldn't post here as often. But not to draw attention away from your complaint or anything :)

I think his point was: not a well-known character -> not as many people being a fan of the character -> not as many people interested in the image, we are told to approve what we like after all.

Unbreakable said:

I think his point was: not a well-known character -> not as many people being a fan of the character -> not as many people interested in the image, we are told to approve what we like after all.

That is true. I should hope approvers don't do this consciously, but then, I'm pretty sure I'd do the same thing if I was an approver. It can't be helped.

post #2539221

post #3678226
post #3678228

post #3666001 was also deleted and I don't understand why. Could someone tell me what could have made this post not being approved please? Body proportions seem fine...

I don't understand why it wasn't approved, there are more images of that artist uploaded here with the same quality post #3716266

This is just a detexted, I don't understand the problem either post #3717788

post #3717570

Lemme guess: Poor spine?

AltrougeBrunestud said:
This is just a detexted, I don't understand the problem either post #3717788

Unless the artist himself detexted it, we don't allow it on booru. As it's considered 3rd party edit

Runty said:

post #3717570

Lemme guess: Poor spine?

That and the very thin waist compare to the hip and chest area.

I don't understand why post #3717193 was deleted, given that it's consistent in style with the rest of the artist's works.

Proportions seem fine, coloring seems fine - perhaps the approvers weren't familiar with the artist?