[APPROVED] unimply Ear Ribbon

BUR #1994 has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

remove implication ear_ribbon -> animal_ears
remove implication ear_ribbon -> bow

Reason:

• The ribbon/bow could be tied around ear of real animal, stuff toy or chibi animal character, animal hat/hood/costumes or human ear(s). And all of them shouldn't tag with animal ears.
• I don't really feel strongly about unimply with bow since bow and ribbon overlap with each other a lot , but tagging bow on post like post #3187235 feel so wrong. We could just tag them manually depend on the picture.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1994 (forum #155946) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Why shouldn't we tag animal ears on hat/hood/costumes? There has been no decision not to do this anywhere as far as I can find, the only related thing I found even points to the opposite (forum #90030) and I don't seen why not, they are still animal ears even when fake, the fake animal ears tag even implies it for starters.

The other examples in the first point I agree with, though.

It's what I read from animal ears wiki:

Don't use it for costumes or hats with animal ears.

I don't mind tagging animal ears on costume stuff, though. Despite of what in the wiki, people still tagging them that way. I don't tag it but I won't remove it if i see one.

Looking at it it seems that line was added by Schrobby 4 years ago and I don't see any good reason to restrict it like that, if I search for cat ears I would like to see fake ones too.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

Can a moderator look at this? These implications are just absurd and they need to go away.

As of now we have images like post #1638640 tagged animal_ears and post #2073743 tagged bow and there's nothing anyone can do to fix them until the implications are removed.

The bulk update request #1994 (forum #155946) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Sorry about that. It's live.