Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #3339503, post #3339505, post #3339508, and post #3339510 seem like something from dandon_fuga with a little less sheen.
And the twitter version of post #3411451 seemed fine, so I assumed the original format would've been as well.
I've found some old posts that may be worth checking again.
post #3380452
post #3391790
post #3400920
post #2796935
post #2796836
Updated
It has been reviewed by 12 approvers. 12 did not like the post enough to approve it.
post #3516203
I think this picture is a good picture for the Foot fetish。but…
17 people joined the collection, but 12 people didn't like it。So，deleted……
Like or dislike, too subjective, not fair reason？
Possibly missed due to a complete lack of tags and the uploader, but nothing is really wrong with it.
(edit: okay, maybe the neck is a bit thin, but it's still alright)
Updated
post #3517078
post #3517079
The parent was approved, these are two of the four the technically not actually nude variants
post #3510355
post #3510358
post #3510363
post #3510370
They got different HUDs, I've translated most of them
Can a mod check this: post #3521094?
It was posted shortly after the twitter version: post #3521049 which has lower resolution and file size.
anonymous_12345 said:
First post said:
4) Never appeal a post twice. Multiple mods saw it the first time you did. They also saw it when it was first uploaded. It got its fair shot.
post #3520848
post #3520843
(parent and childrens)
this stuff by neocoill is like the others and perfectly fine
post #3521864
post #3512565
post #3499448
I see nothing wrong with this.
