Use of YouTube copyright tag

I have noticed on an image that YouTube was used for an image that just included a virtual youtuber, and searching further found the tag is used either for that or just a logo.

I suggest we make a youtube logo tag for just logos and not use the youtube tag for anything.

An additional way the tag is used are the YouTube app or website or unspecified video players. For the former we could make something like "youtube video" (although it may, albeit unlikely, be a page without a video) or "youtube (site)" - and for a video player, video player.

I could knock this one out myself in a day, but before doing that I'd like to bonce this off you all.

i can't imagine what else the youtube tag would be used for other than the logo or direct references to it's video player. images of characters using the site on their computer or something aren't going to be that common, but there are probably better ways of finding that than being really strict with a copyright tag. virtual youtuber is already a tag if someone needs to remove them from a search.

+1 for splitting youtube into youtube logo and youtube (site) (for fake screenshots or other references to the actual site itself).

I'd prefer youtube (site) over youtube video. We may to do something similar for other sites like NicoNico or Twitter, and it'd be useful to have consistency.