May I ask why we have gawain_(fate/extra) and gawain_(fate/grand_order)? Is there any difference between the two?
Posted under Tags
May I ask why we have gawain_(fate/extra) and gawain_(fate/grand_order)? Is there any difference between the two?
There shouldn't be two tags. The gawain_(fate/grand_order) tag seems to be almost entirely the doing of one user adding it to Gawain images connected to FGO for some reason.
mass update gawain_(fate/extra) gawain_(fate/grand_order) -> gawain_(fate/extra)
As Gawain originated in Fate Extra and isn't some unique version in FGO, the FGO variant character tag should be removed and deprecated where possible.
See comment forum #141138
EDIT: hope I did that right...
EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #1505 (forum #143835) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
ChrisAnthem123 said:
mass update gawain_(fate/extra) gawain_(fate/grand_order) -> gawain_(fate/extra)
As Gawain originated in Fate Extra and isn't some unique version in FGO, the FGO variant character tag should be removed and deprecated where possible.
See comment forum #141138
EDIT: hope I did that right...
You only need to include the tag that should be removed in this case, I fixed it for you.
I suggest just going with gawain_(fate) since originating works don't need be remarked on unless there are multiple versions of the same character. And also it would be consistent with the rest of the tags.
create alias saber_(fate/prototype) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
True name (see Wiki)
EDIT: The bulk update request #1510 (forum #143894) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
EDIT: The tag alias saber_(fate/prototype) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Provence said:
create alias saber_(fate/prototype) -> king_arthur_pendragon
True name (see Wiki)
Shouldn't this be
mass update saber_(fate/prototype) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
for consistency with bulk update request #1427 ?
r0d3n7z said:
Shouldn't this be
mass update saber_(fate/prototype) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
for consistency with bulk update request #1427 ?
Edited the request.
Was unsure how to go, but that's consistent and less awkward sounding.
Thank you.
The bulk update request #1510 (forum #143894) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
The tag alias saber_(fate/prototype) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
The bulk update request #1505 (forum #143835) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.