Posted under Tags
create implication holding_hammer -> hammer
This would be consistent with these existing implications:
EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The tag implication holding_hammer -> hammer (forum #143223) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
What do we want to do about warhammers? That tag doesn't implicate hammer but several of the holding hammer tags are used to refer to warhammers, which doesn't currently have its own holding tag.
kuuderes_shadow said:
What do we want to do about warhammers? That tag doesn't implicate hammer but several of the holding hammer tags are used to refer to warhammers, which doesn't currently have its own holding tag.
Provence said:
Didn't we discuss in a prior topic? But that wasn't about warhammers but about mallets.
The tag hammer seems to have a sizeable number of warhammers (e.g. post #3002599) and mallets (e.g. post #2985412).
This actually makes sense. Mallets and warhammers are certain kinds of hammers.
I suggest creating claw_hammer for this common kind of hammer (e.g. post #3025623).
Then, I suggest creating these implications:
Update:
I created/populated claw_hammer. It had to dig up a bit. Most posts tagged hammer actually are about mallets and warhammers.
Do we want things like post #2265176 and post #543439 to be tagged with hammer? Then again there doesnt seem to be that many posts that would get weirdly tagged and it would make tagging mallet and warhammer easier.
A cautious +1 from me.
create implication claw_hammer -> hammer
create implication mallet -> hammer
create implication warhammer -> hammer
As discussed above.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #1483 (forum #143272) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
ion288 said:
Maybe we need a mallet_(instrument) (along the same lines as bow_(instrument)) tag for those.
ion288 said:
Do we want things like post #2265176 and post #543439 to be tagged with hammer? Then again there doesnt seem to be that many posts that would get weirdly tagged and it would make tagging mallet and warhammer easier.
A cautious +1 from me.
I don't mind tagging these posts with hammer if it's OK with everyone. Then again, we might want to create a new tag (maybe percussion_mallet) for these posts, which would imply mallet.
Gollgagh said:
Maybe we need a mallet_(instrument) (along the same lines as bow_(instrument)) tag for those.
We basically posted that idea at the same time.
Just as a matter of subjective personal opinion, I like percussion_mallet a bit better than mallet_(instrument). I like to avoid parentheses when possible in tag names. But mallet_(instrument) is fine too in my opinion, and could at least be an alias.
If you are wanting to tag a mallet, you're not going to start with a "p", so mallet_(instrument) is preferable IMO. Plus it's consistent with various other tags.
kuuderes_shadow said:
If you are wanting to tag a mallet, you're not going to start with a "p", so mallet_(instrument) is preferable IMO. Plus it's consistent with various other tags.
So mallet_(instrument) then. Maybe we can do the alias the other way around: percussion_mallet -> mallet_(instrument).
I suggest we leave percussion mallet behind since mallet_(instrument) is populated.
Im finding a lot of mallets that should be tagged warhammer can something be both? Also shouldnt it be spelled "war hammer"?
ion288 said:
I suggest we leave percussion mallet behind since mallet_(instrument) is populated.
Im finding a lot of mallets that should be tagged warhammer can something be both? Also shouldnt it be spelled "war hammer"?
For what it's worth, I'm the one who started populating mallet_(instrument) as per this discussion.
Could you mention any examples of posts tagged mallet that should be tagged warhammer?
I do agree with you what "war hammer" seems correct. That's the spelling that Wikipedia uses: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_hammer
Sure. In descending order of warhammernes: post #1475793 post #848649 post #1338239 post #120065 and post #2836979.
If Type kun is reading this the implications are not affected by this discussion so go ahead please :)
ion288 said:
Also shouldnt it be spelled "war hammer"?
I discovered that there's already a tag war_hammer for a specific magic weapon found in Nanoha. It has only 5 posts. Maybe it could be renamed to war_hammer_(nanoha). Then our current warhammer could be moved to war_hammer.
Oddly enough, the Nanoha thing is a character tag. I suppose it should be a general tag, shouldn't it?
Disclaimer: I don't watch Nanoha, I'm not familiar with this anime.
ion288 said:
Sure. In descending order of warhammernes: post #1475793 post #848649 post #1338239 post #120065 and post #2836979.
OK, that's tough. Maybe in fact the same object can be a war hammer and a mallet.
Feel free to correct me or disagree, but in my mind the word "mallet" is more about the shape of the object, and the word "war hammer" is more about the object as a realistic deadly weapon.
warhammer even implies weapon, which sounds good to me.
So I would say that King DeDeDe, Amy (Sonic) and Ramona Flowers really use "mallets" because of the objects' shape, but not "warhammers" because they look like silly colorful oversized toys rather than actual weapons. Just my two cents.
The tag implication holding_hammer -> hammer (forum #143223) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
