Colored chokers - keep or nuke?

Pretty self-explanatory. Ribbon choker, bell choker and frilled choker are implicated to choker, but those are different styles rather than colors.

There are some other types of chokers that I'll make a BUR for, but I wanted to ask about colored chokers. Would it be worth creating and populating them, or just get rid of the existing ones? The color with the highest number of tags ATM is black choker at 135 posts.

create implication anchor_choker -> choker
create implication lace-trimmed_choker -> choker
create implication lace-trimmed_choker -> lace_trim
create implication lace_choker -> lace
create implication lace_choker -> choker
create implication o-ring_choker -> choker
create implication o-ring_choker -> o-ring
create alias o_ring -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_top -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_bottom -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_bikini -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_swimsuit -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_panties -> panties
create implication o-ring_panties -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_panties -> o-ring_bottom
create implication o-ring_legwear -> o-ring

Link to request

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1101 (forum #127237) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Yes keep them. Why eschew potentially useful information? A lot of tags need more specific classification so I have been growing them, including the [color]_choker subsets. I've been holding off on making a request until some of the other categories eclipsed 100.

Not so sure about aliasing lace_choker to lace-trimmed_choker. Lace seems fine.

Anchor choker seems like a really iffy tag. What I imagine is a choker with an anchor pendant or just an anchor symbol. However with the posts tagged with it it seems sometimes inapplicable.

Not sure about o-ring bottom implication

+1 to the rest with those exceptions

sweetpeɐ said:

Not sure about o-ring bottom implication

Why aren't you sure? Panties are a type of bottomwear, right?

create implication black_choker -> choker
create implication blue_choker -> choker
create implication brown_choker -> choker
create implication green_choker -> choker
create implication heart_choker -> choker
create implication heart_choker -> heart
create implication orange_choker -> choker
create implication pink_choker -> choker
create implication purple_choker -> choker
create implication red_choker -> choker
create implication spiked_choker -> choker
create implication spiked_choker -> spikes
create implication star_choker -> choker
create implication star_choker -> star
create implication white_choker -> choker
create implication yellow_choker -> choker

Link to request

More choker-related implications. There may be other ones in the future, but I'll leave it like this for now.

Bump. These <color>_choker tags have grown significantly and many of them are missing the choker tag.

+1 to all of the above.

Edit:

I'm going through and tagging many of the above with my mass updater and have already tagged over a thousand...

It seems the request was changed regarding the lace_choker -> lace-trimmed_choker part, that's good.

I still withhold support for the anchor_choker implications. In this tag there are many images where a choker isn't present at all. There are characters adorned with an anchor object at the middle of their collarbone but without a band going around their neck like a choker. Another example is an anchor object worn as the pendant of a necklace but no choker. Perhaps another tag such as a anchor_ornament could be created for some of these misapplications of anchor choker?

chinatsu said:

I still withhold support for the anchor_choker implications. In this tag there are many images where a choker isn't present at all. There are characters adorned with an anchor object at the middle of their collarbone but without a band going around their neck like a choker. Another example is an anchor object worn as the pendant of a necklace but no choker. Perhaps another tag such as a anchor_ornament could be created for some of these misapplications of anchor choker?

That sounds reasonable. I'd be in support of gardening that tag down to only include instances that actually have a choker visible.

Bump and +1 for the implications above since we removed chokers from the colored neckwear tags.

+1

I don't see anything wrong with the o-ring_panties -> o-ring_bottom implication.

Went through the posts under anchor choker and removed it where necessary along with choker and adding anchor. Created anchor collar for collar cases.

+1.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1101 (forum #127237) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

create implication lace-trimmed_choker -> choker
create implication lace-trimmed_choker -> lace_trim
create implication lace_choker -> lace
create implication lace_choker -> choker
create implication o-ring_choker -> choker
create implication o-ring_choker -> o-ring
create alias o_ring -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_top -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_bottom -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_bikini -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_swimsuit -> o-ring
create implication o-ring_panties -> panties
create implication o-ring_panties -> o-ring_bottom
create implication o-ring_legwear -> o-ring

Link to request

Resubmitting after automatic rejection.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1590 (forum #146231) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #1590 (forum #146231) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.