Rignak said:
I don't understand why you are distinguishing title and name, we could call it an identifier it will be the same.
Because one is the characters actual name, the other one is just telling you what the character is currently looking like. It is like adding "cape" or "vampire" or "disguise" to a character. What I mean is, if a character is visible a vampire in an image you tag it as vampire, but you ALSO tag it as what it's name is. IN images it isn't a vampire however, you only tag it by name.
EB said:
Then what about post #2544280, post #2559590, and post #2561431? If you wanted to search Kishibe Souta's civilian form, then that's a little over a third of the current relevant results being excluded.
There is no problem. If you want the civilian form, then just do a search for both names. If you want genderswap, just search for genderswap + names. If you don't want the genderswap, just do a search and -genderswap.
EB said:
Rather it makes searching for a character more difficult. Say you don't know their title name or fake name but know who the character is... then you wouldn't get the images you were searching for since they wouldn't turn up at all.
No you would since both names are used. One is a title/fake name used on the characters when they are in fake persona, the other one is the real name they have which should be used on all forms since they aren't seperate characters.
Really, if you want to make this an issue you should focus your attention on characters such as "Saber", where the classification is incorrectly used as the name of the character and even used on characters such as master_artoria where it shouldn't be applied at all.
Jarlath said:
Let's be realistic - just because a character has a secret identity doesn't mean that a search should always pull up that person by their secret identity or vice versa
Why? Lets use "Robin" from Batman. His disguise is Robin, but it isn't always the same person that took on the title. So if I want say images of Robin but of say Nathan_Drake and not he other one -- but I also wanted images where he was actually Robin and not just his civilian self -- then I would search for "Robin" + "nathan_drake".
Jarlath said:
regular users who are tag-limited in their searches,
So paying users should suffer because not paying users have a problem? That doesn't seem right. Rather, shouldn't those that pay get some benefits? That and as a non-paying user, I can't say I have ever had any problems of the nature you are describing.
Jarlath said:
Vega looks absolutely nothing like Orie, especially not in her Princess of Arktos days - her hair and eye color are even more different from her civilian look than her civvie look is from her Vega identity.
How is this relevant? They are still the same person.
Jarlath said:
Ditto Shazam and the ol6 other boys and girls who are his component parts - with the suggestion that we include the alternate identity with the character, a Shazam -1girl search may end up removing pictures that would have come back if those characters aren't included automatically in the search.
No, like I said... the Shazam you are talking about is a special case. If the Shazam has the same mind and just needs the souls of the other kids, then it should be tagged with just the name of that kid that is controlling Shazam. However is Shazam is a person that is magically conjured by using the souls of 6 other people, then he is a separate individual and would not be tagged as the kids since they are just akin to a magic wand that summoned him. So Shazam would not be tagged with their names since he wouldn't be them. It is pretty straight forward.
Jarlath said:
Plus, we tag ONLY what we see is the rule - and if Sheik or Batman is in the picture in their identity concealing outfit, I don't see Zelda or Bruce Wayne as Batman doesn't usually go around without his mask while wearing Bruce Wayne's suit. So yes, #1 us going to pollute searches via its automatic implication. Especially if you're limited to two tags like a Regular user. Even Gold users could run into issues if they need to use one or more of their 6 tags to filter out those alternate identities or versions.
How is using "-" on considered difficult? It does not pollute if you use "-".
Jarlath said:
Plus spoilers. Per the tagging guidelines we have to add the spoiler tag to images that can be spoilers, and have the spoiler dtext tag for comments. Method #1 explicitly violates the no spoiler policy by immediately linking two apparently unrelated characters in the search. So we either need to toss the no spoiler rule or accept that it's no longer possible to enforce with that method.
Yes, and rather THAT is a rule that should be changed. See my comment about how spoilers are used on stuff like the real name of "lightening". Even if something is by definition a "spoiler", if it isn't actually a spoiler in practice (such as female Ranma being the male Ranma since that is pretty much the entire story and revealed in the first episode) Then it shouldn't be tagged as spoiler. Rather such spoilers should not be considered spoilers at all. However mods here don't agree with me on this one from what I can tell, so there wont be any change to this rule. What I am however saying is that the rule you are referring to is one based on flawed logic, invalidating your entire argument.