[Prototype] User Report Ver 6.3

It should probably definitely have a name change, if nothing else.

Here are a couple ideas for names...

1. Tagging combinations
2. Tagging combos
3. Member Tagging Combinations
4. Member-level Tag Gardening

... or any combination of the above. Thoughts? Additional names?

For myself, I like #3 the best.

I think that the 3. option is the shortest, but still the most intuitive of those.
The same goes of course for note and pool vadalism. I assume that this is also for users that are below Builder rank only? What is about Gold/Platinum?

I think the general idea was that Gold/Platinum account have investment in this site, so they would be less likely to commit vandalism.

BrokenEagle98 said:

issue #2690

That report is just a rough first attempt. It's being placed on Isshiki so that others can comment on it to help refine it. Not sure what the metrics are to record an instance as vandalism...? I'll have to take a look through the code later to see how it works...

Edit:

Looks like what it's doing is counting every tag edit combination by Member-level users, and displays all that have a count >= 5.

Perhaps a name change would be appropriate to remove the negative connotation, because as you pointed out, many of those edits are valid.

Thoughts?

I'd be calling it "mass tag changes" as that describes the activity, and most of those changes look like valid gardening activities to me.

Would it be worth including the gold and platinum members, in case there's some sort of edit war?

Latest Update

Ver 4.7 -> Ver 4.8

• Added two new categories to Pools report <provence: forum #122362>
• Obsolete adds and obsolete removes
• These are adds or removes which were undone by another user at a later time
• Added a new Supply vs Demand table
• Compares the Number of Searches with the frequency of tags for all uploads

Other

Jarlath said:

Would it be worth including the gold and platinum members, in case there's some sort of edit war?

It would significantly increase the size of the report, which would make it lengthier to analyze for any bad edits, but it's definitely possible. What do others think about this?

As for the name change, I'd like to wait for a few more days to see if there are any other name suggestions before submitting an issue on GitHub.

Ho ho ho... Merry Christmas!

Latest Update

• Updated all of the tables and raw data as requested prior to the big holiday period.

As always, chime in if you have ideas to make the reports more extensive or better.

Thanks for doing this. Time to write NNescio a DMail when they are actualized :3.

Thanks for making a revision. The report page looks much more compact and therefore better now.
Compliments to the work :3. Anyways, if some are wondering why the old link doesn't work: It was replaced by this link, that is also on the opening post:
http://isshiki.donmai.us/user-reports/

@BrokenEagle98
http://isshiki.donmai.us/user-reports/notes/2017-01-01_v1.html
I was wondering about this quite some time now: Shouldn't we count the Note report based of the total amount? Because right now, it is ordered based on the "Creates" column.

@Type-kun
I have a question: what do you think about making this topic "Sticky", so it is always on the first page in the forum?

Provence said:

@BrokenEagle98
http://isshiki.donmai.us/user-reports/notes/2017-01-01_v1.html
I was wondering about this quite some time now: Shouldn't we count the Note report based of the total amount? Because right now, it is ordered based on the "Creates" column.

Yeah, probably... I'll create an issue for this. Until then, you can always reorder any of the columns by clicking on the column heading.

Edit:

Created issue # 5 to address the column ordering and issue # 6 to address the name of the Tag Vandalism report on Reportbooru.

Provence said:

@BrokenEagle98
http://isshiki.donmai.us/user-reports/notes/2017-01-01_v1.html
I was wondering about this quite some time now: Shouldn't we count the Note report based of the total amount? Because right now, it is ordered based on the "Creates" column.

@Type-kun
I have a question: what do you think about making this topic "Sticky", so it is always on the first page in the forum?

I see no reason, it's updated often enough to be on the first pages. Besides, people who are interested in that sort of stats will find it anyway, and it's neat, but not like it's something that everyone absolutely must to see.

Type-kun said:

I see no reason, it's updated often enough to be on the first pages. Besides, people who are interested in that sort of stats will find it anyway, and it's neat, but not like it's something that everyone absolutely must to see.

Makes sense. Thanks for the answer.

BrokenEagle98 said:

Created issue # 5 to address the column ordering and issue # 6 to address the name of the Tag Vandalism report on Reportbooru.

Just as a status update, both issues 5 and 6 have been addressed.

For the issue on the name of the vandalism report, the name of the directory will remain the same, but some clarifying language has been added to the report itself.

Latest Update

Ver 4.8 -> Ver 4.9

• Added description changes to Pools report

@BrokenEagle98 - could I ask you to update the raw data again please?

Sorry... it finished late last night and that step skipped my mind. I'll do it once I get home, then post here again once I'm done.

The raw data has been uploaded.

Thanks.

Quick update since I was in a conversation with albert regarding some approvers.
There is now a report with the title "Inactive approvers". It pretty much is the same as the "Approver report" but the other way round:
http://isshiki.donmai.us/user-reports/inactive_approvers/

I'll also go out and look out for new Janitors, since there were some demotions lately. Let's see if something good comes out of it.