Posted under Tags
create implication granblue_fantasy -> cygames
create implication shingeki_no_bahamut -> cygames
create implication shadowverse -> cygames
Cygames shares characters between these three copyrights. Bahamut characters show up in Granblue, and many Shadowverse card arts are directly taken from Bahamut. A fanart of a character could intended for any of these copyrights, so I suggest having "cygames" be a catch-all for these characters.
Mileavis said:
Huh, is that so? That convention doesn't seem to be followed currently and I'm not sure if I missed anything relating to that in howto:copyright.
It seems to be a rule that we didn't tightly govern in the past, hence the Nintendo, Capcom, Sega etc. tags are a mess.
See also forum #13160
-1 as most of the time parent groups are for the game series or copyright versus the originating company (which can change, as Index and Atlus were bought out by Sega).
Notice that Kantai_Collection doesn't automatically alias to Kadokawa Games, the various DMM properties don't alias to DMM, and neither Dragon Quest or Final Fantasy alias to Square Enix.
topic #13160 has the previous thread on this type of implication.
My reasoning was that the three copyrights share a lot of characters. Probably like 90%+ of all Shadowverse cards are direct bringovers from Bahamut. In a way, I feel it's more similar to all the specific Pokemon games implicating Pokemon and all the FF games implicating Final Fantasy, rather than Final Fantasy implicating Square Enix.
I suggested the Cygames tag for this since it was already being used, and I don't know if they've named the universe where all these characters exist together (or they might even just be Alternate Universes that share characters, like idk, Legend of Zelda or something), but I can see the issues with using a company name's tag, I guess.
The bulk update request #1067 has been rejected.
