create implication mole_under_eye -> facial_mark
create implication mole_under_mouth -> facial_mark
Noticed these two weren't implied, seemed like an obvious one to me.
Posted under Tags
create implication mole_under_eye -> facial_mark
create implication mole_under_mouth -> facial_mark
Noticed these two weren't implied, seemed like an obvious one to me.
I don't think that's what facial mark is supposed to be used for.
Ah, alright. You're probably right on that one, although it did seem like there was a small case of mistagging then:
facial_mark ~mole_under_eye ~mole_under_mouth
1girl facial_mark ~mole_under_eye ~mole_under_mouth
In addition to that though, someone (Garren) added in the japanese words for moles to the wiki page for facial mark. I removed them just moments ago, but I suppose we'll have to do some minor gardening to clean that up since there are a decent number of entries that have facial mark tagged but don't actually have a facial mark -- just a mole.
I checked and only found a handful - the vast majority of those images are ones like post #2376336 that have both moles and facial marks.
Fair enough, I'll go ahead and just reject this BUR for now then.
EDIT: Also re-edited the page facial mark to make this more clear.
EDIT 2: And I think it's cleaned up.
Updated
The bulk update request #993 has been rejected.