[bulk] FGO variant characters, missing implications

create implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate/grand_order)
create implication mary_read_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate) -> mary_read_(fate/grand_order)
create implication anne_bonny_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate) -> anne_bonny_(fate/grand_order)
create implication kiyohime_(swimsuit_lancer)_(fate) -> kiyohime_(fate/grand_order)
create implication tamamo_no_mae_(swimsuit_lancer)_(fate) -> caster_(fate/extra)
create implication saint_martha_(swimsuit_ruler)_(fate) -> saint_martha
create implication marie_antoinette_(swimsuit_caster)_(fate) -> marie_antoinette_(fate/grand_order)
create implication artoria_pendragon_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate) -> saber
create implication mordred_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate) -> saber_of_red
create implication li_shuwen_(fate/grand_order) -> assassin_(fate/extra)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(halloween)_(fate) -> lancer_(fate/extra_ccc)

Link to request

In Shuwen's case, the FGO tag is being used for the young Lancer version.
The Extra tag is being used for the Assassin version, which may or may not be the same appearance as the upcoming FGO old Assassin version. Until FGO releases the latter, an implication should be fine for now.

Added Ishtar (fate/grand order) -> Toosaka Rin implication to KyteM's request.

Added medusa_(lancer)_(fate) -> rider and gilgamesh_(caster)_(fate) -> gilgamesh.

Bulk update request #948 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication scathach_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> scathach_(fate/grand_order))

Bulk update request #948 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication mordred_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate) -> saber_of_red)

The bulk update request #948 has been approved.

New topic will be a waste, so post it here.

Looks like due to new cosplay tag auto implications dangerous beast tag become green, but it's just an outfit, so general make more sense.
I'll vote for purging dangerous beast (cosplay) since dangerous_beast shielder_(fate/grand_order)_(cosplay) search must cover it properly and change it back to general after that.
Thoughts?

OniTea said:

New topic will be a waste, so post it here.

Looks like due to new cosplay tag auto implications dangerous beast tag become green, but it's just an outfit, so general make more sense.
I'll vote for purging dangerous beast (cosplay) since dangerous_beast shielder_(fate/grand_order)_(cosplay) search must cover it properly and change it back to general after that.
Thoughts?

Even if it's only an outfit I'd prefer it stays green to keep consistent with how other Fate servant variants and craft essence are tagged.

The tag implication li_shuwen_(fate/grand_order) -> assassin_(fate/extra) has been rejected by @albert.