tapnek said:
Thinking about aliasing giant breasts to gigantic breasts since it's one way to say the other.
+1
Posted under Tags
tapnek said:
Thinking about aliasing giant breasts to gigantic breasts since it's one way to say the other.
+1
The bulk update request #797 has been approved.
tapnek said:
Thinking about aliasing giant breasts to gigantic breasts since it's one way to say the other.
-1 If it made it to the missed search top list, that'd be one thing, but it's not.
I don't think we should go down the rabbit hole of going to the thesaurus for every possible synonym in the off-case that somebody might use it.
BrokenEagle98 said:
-1 If it made it to the missed search top list, that'd be one thing, but it's not.
I don't think we should go down the rabbit hole of going to the thesaurus for every possible synonym in the off-case that somebody might use it.
Yeah, I guess you're right.
OT: This missed search top list seems to be informative and entertaining at the same time. What's up with "overwa"? xD
reiyasona said:
OT: This missed search top list seems to be informative and entertaining at the same time. What's up with "overwa"? xD
The only thing I can think of is that they have Javascript disabled on this site and/or too quick with typing and entering, or it's the same person hitting the site using the API and the wrong search term.
After estimating, comparing and tagging the size of several thousand breasts I realized that the large_breasts definition needs some adjustments.
The majority of posts tagged large_breasts contain breasts were a single breast is approaching the volume of its owner's head but almost never reaching it entirely. Usually a large breast takes up around three-fourths of the owner's head. I'd like to create an adjusted definition that reflects my observations. Thus, the volume of a single large breast should be between three-fourths the volume of the owner's head and the entire volume of the owner's head.
Updated
reiyasona said:
After estimating, comparing and tagging the size of several thousand breasts I realized that the large_breasts definition needs some adjustments.
Yeah, I noticed that as well. I adjusted by only taking the face portion into account, as the head can appear much larger depending upon the angle it's being viewed from. So basically, if you were to draw a circle inside the face portion is what I'm talking about, where the radius matches the width of the face. Anything close to that size I tagged with large breasts.
That definition probably needs a bit of work, but it's a bit easier than trying to figure out percentages of the head size...
BrokenEagle98 said:
Yeah, I noticed that as well. I adjusted by only taking the face portion into account, as the head can appear much larger depending upon the angle it's being viewed from. So basically, if you were to draw a circle inside the face portion is what I'm talking about, where the radius matches the width of the face. Anything close to that size I tagged with large breasts.
That definition probably needs a bit of work, but it's a bit easier than trying to figure out percentages of the head size...
At first glance this approach looks pretty solid. I'll do some testing.
tapnek said:
I was thinking about that until I took chibis into the equation.
Chibis are out of the equation anyway. Of course we could explicitly exclude them in the definition of all breast sizes, just to be on the safe side.
I adjusted my comparisons based on post #2168938 a little bit.
The size of most large breasts I encounter on a daily basis ranges from number 14 to 20.
Before changing any definitions, I'd like to receive a little bit more feedback regarding my observation and BrokenEagle98's suggestion.
Updated
reiyasona said:
Since changes made in this thread are kinda large in scale, would the introduction of the medium_breasts tag warrant a notice on this site's announcement banner for a couple of days?
reiyasona said:
Nice!
Provence and I plan to work as a team to populate the medium breasts tag.
I propose the following tag gardening approach:
- Go through these two pools first because almost every post in it is in desperate need of a breast tag. Only posts like those should remain in the pool afterwards.
- nipples ~1girl ~multiple_girls -breasts -flat_chest (~8700 posts)
- covered_nipples ~1girl ~multiple_girls -breasts -flat_chest (~5900 posts)
So..the first pool is done. All 8700 posts are now tagged with the breast sizes where it is needed (there are some nipples of nipples, but the girl's breasts aren't visible. So..time to tackle the second pool.
Provence said:
So..the first pool is done. All 8700 posts are now tagged with the breast sizes where it is needed (there are some nipples of nipples, but the girl's breasts aren't visible. So..time to tackle the second pool.
Well done!
The second pool has ~4130 posts left.
Edit: The second pool has now ~3000 posts left.
Updated
The first two pools I mentioned in forum #116365 are completely tagged now. Many thanks to @Provence for helping me out. Let's reach for 10k posts tagged medium_breasts!
- Go through these two pools first because almost every post in it is in desperate need of a breast tag. Only posts like those should remain in the pool afterwards.
nipples ~1girl ~multiple_girls -breasts -flat_chest (~8700 posts)tagging completecovered_nipples ~1girl ~multiple_girls -breasts -flat_chest (~5900 posts)tagging complete
@Provence just tagged the id range 1..10000 of the third pool: order:id id:1..10000 breasts -small_breasts -medium_breasts -large_breasts -huge_breasts -gigantic_breasts
As a consequence, the tag counter of medium_breasts has exceeded 10k! （*’∀’人）♥
Next milestone is 20k! ( •̀ᄇ• ́)ﻭ✧
reiyasona said:
@Provence just tagged the id range 1..10000 of the third pool: order:id id:1..10000 breasts -small_breasts -medium_breasts -large_breasts -huge_breasts -gigantic_breasts
As a consequence, the tag counter of medium_breasts has exceeded 10k! （*’∀’人）♥
Next milestone is 20k! ( •̀ᄇ• ́)ﻭ✧
I'm doing what I can with new uploads that have a breast focus.